Home > WORLD NEWS > Corporate Media Conveniently Omits Dead Afghan Civilians

Corporate Media Conveniently Omits Dead Afghan Civilians

As President Trump calls for a troop increase to liberate Afghanistan from the clutches of the Taliban- and re-introduce Afghan women to miniskirts (see below)- the stakes are high for those bearing the brunt of Western empire building.

Over 31,000 Afghan civilians have already lost their lives in the 16-year-long war, a fact rarely mentioned by US corporate media.

Afghanistan was a liberal society in the 60’s and 70’s, until the US lost the war in Vietnam and its credibility in the eyes of the Arab and Muslim world regarding Israel.

afghanEver since, women in Afghanistan and surrounding areas have been more and more forced to cover-up as Islamization has taken hold.

Today radical Islam has outposts across the old silk road running through Asia from the Mediterranean.

President Trump wants to stay indefinitely in Afghanistan after campaigning for president that he would not.

A 1972 photo of women wearing miniskirts in Kabul helped persuade Trump to commit to war in Afghanistan, reports Quartz.

The mainstream media meanwhile fail to mention the civilian death toll in America’s longest running war, and the consequences of a century long “generational struggle.

By Adam JohnsonFairness & Accuracy in Reporting:

As President Donald Trump tries to make the case for staying indefinitely in Afghanistan, the stakes for those actually living there are rarely broached by US corporate media.

In dozens of write-ups, recaps and reports on Trump’s “major” Afghan War speech, almost no outlets took time out to note the plight or condition of the people the US is nominally there to save. The New York Times (8/21/178/22/17), Washington Post(8/21/17), Chicago Tribune (8/22/17), CNN (8/21/178/21/17), NBC News (8/21/17), ABC News (8/21/17) and CBS News (8/21/17), among others, didn’t mention the Afghan death toll at all in their summary of events in the region.

Almost all, however, reserved airtime and column inches to mention the number of US soldiers and cost to the US treasury—presumably the only moral metric that matters. One notable exception was Ali Velshi at MSNBC (8/21/17), who did mention live on air how many Afghans were killed in the first half of 2017—a scope curiously limited to the term of the current Republican president, but an improvement on silence nonetheless.

US media also continued their rich tradition of not blaming the US or Trump for the war—instead laying responsibility at the feet of some unknown geopolitical dark matter that has forced the US to occupy Afghanistan permanently. The US isn’t waging ongoing war in the Central Asian country; it is simply “stuck,” according to the AP (8/21/17) and the Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty. Trump isn’t continuing the occupation; according to the Sacramento Bee (8/21/17); he “Keeps US Stuck in Afghanistan Quagmire.” The US doesn’t seek further war and occupation, but to “break free from the quagmire,” the Chicago Tribune(8/22/17) spells out.* Bush, Obama and Trump didn’t make a deliberate choice to bomb Afghanistan, according to PBS’s Judy Woodruff (8/21/17);  attacking the country just became “the burden of three presidents.” War was consistently depicted as being thrust upon the US government by forces outside of its control.

The number of Afghan civilians killed during the 16-year US military occupation is well over 31,000, according to researchers at Brown University. The average American couldn’t possibly know this fact, since it’s almost never mentioned when weighing the cost/benefit ratio of further military occupation and bombing.

Just as the thousands killed in Yemen by US-backed Saudi bombing don’t inform coverage of the famine there, the causal effect of US military action on poor, faceless brown people is never clearly laid out. The US bombs and, on a totally separate note, people are dying. That the United States may be causing the suffering, and could choose to stop doing so, is never really considered, much less argued in any meaningful way.

*The Chicago Tribune editorial does mention civilian deaths, referring to a 2016 UN report, but the paper attributes them solely to “ambushes and suicide bomb attacks” by insurgent forces, whereas the UN holds the US and the US-backed government responsible for nearly a quarter of the carnage there. The Tribune also misstates the UN civilian death toll more than threefold, confusing deaths with casualties (which include injuries).

afghan

See AlsoUS Troops Open Fire After Afghan Roadside Bomb, Killing Family

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: