The entire fiasco is sickening, and the Times only seems concerned with who gets to shape the narrative of the Russian collusion story the left used, along with 40 FBI agents to try to take down a sitting president.
The New York Times used unnamed sources, yet again, to claim a ‘leak’ of the Mueller report and subsequent damage. But, they admit that the reason is because it’s crucial that the left shape the Russian collusion narrative, as they have done all along until Attorney General William Barr released his findings.
Of course, these may be the same ‘unnamed sources’ used in its now discredited Pulitzer Prize report on the Russia-gate false flag.
In their own words:
[…] At stake in the dispute — the first evidence of tension between Mr. Barr and the special counsel’s office — is who shapes the public’s initial understanding of one of the most consequential government investigations in American history. Some members of Mr. Mueller’s team are concerned that, because Mr. Barr created the first narrative of the special counsel’s findings, Americans’ views will have hardened before the investigation’s conclusions become public. (link)
Nothing about the gross abuses of the Obama administration.
Sundance, writing for Conservative Treehouse explains it well:
The real problem we have is outlined in the part of the story everyone will read-over without recognizing… because we have become immune to the insanity of it.
…[…] It was also unclear how widespread the vexation is among the special counsel team, which included 19 lawyers, about 40 F.B.I. agents and other personnel.
Think about this carefully.
I’m going to skip over the part where everyone recognizes these are the same [darn] FBI agents investigating Trump in 2016… who transferred into the Mueller team in 2017… to continue the plan into 2018 and 2019.
As if that wasn’t alarming enough… I digress.
Forty FBI Agents spent three years investigating whether or not a chicken-faced baby was actually born in a hen house.
Think about this carefully.
Forty FBI agents, spent three years on a mission to eliminate the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump. Don’t get dragged into the absurdity and travel down their bizarre mirrored path where justification is put through a cognitive blender. Forty FBI Agents spent three years trying to aid a political effort to remove a president.
If you give them the benefit of being sound-minded, we had Forty FBI agents who transparently had to know this was a ridiculously weaponized political operation against the opposing political party of their FBI and DOJ leadership… and they went along with it.
The whole [darn] thing was/is a ruse.
What exactly would forty FBI agents be investigating?
You can take that insufferably overused qualifier: “we’re not talking about the hard-working FBI field agents here…“, and stuff it.
I’m exactly talking about forty transparently corrupt FBI field agents who, according to EVERYONE, participated in an investigation that was transparent political bullsh!t from the beginning….
….And they all did what? Went along with it… that’s what they did.
But, the American public is not allowed to know who these agents are?
President Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani was livid over the supposed leak. He stated:
“it makes the point that we’ve been making for two years. Despite all the media reports about how holy and sanctimonious the Mueller team is, they are a bunch of sneaky, unethical leakers. And they are rabid Democrats who hate the President of the United States.”
He added in a Fox News article:
“And I can’t tell you how much false information they leaked during the course of the investigation. How many people are going to be indicted that didn’t get indicted?”
“How many – how many blockbusters were there? Starting with (former Trump campaign aide George) Papadopoulos and ending with (former Trump lawyer Michael) Cohen who turns out to be a serial liar. I mean, how could you have any confidence in this?”
Giuliani continued this morning in a tweet:
“The NYT story about unspecified troubling findings in report is as accurate as the NYT saying Mueller’s staff didn’t leak. Who leaked this … Mueller’s unethical staff. This proves they are Angry Democrats who couldn’t find or create evidence to support collusion or obstruction.”
And the big issue that practically no one is even considering is the supposed ‘victim’ Carter Page.
Investment Watch Blog reported:
Carter Page was an undercover FBI agent, who helped to bring down a Russian spy ring. Later, the FBI used him and set him up by telling the FISA COURT he was a Russian spy. While working as an undercover agent to bring down the Russian spy ring, he met with the Russians, of course.
The FBI took those meetings later and used them to make him look like a Russian spy.
This article explains his undercover operation.
Carter Page was an FBI under-cover employee in 2013, and remained the primary FBI witness through May of 2016 throughout the case.
If Carter Page was working as a UCE (FBI undercover employee), responsible for the bust of a high level Russian agent in 2013 -and remained a UCE- throughout the court case UP TO May of 2016, how is it possible that on October 21st 2016 Carter Page is put under a FISA Title 1 surveillance warrant as an alleged Russian agent? He wasn’t. The DOJ National Security Division and the FBI Counterintelligence Division, knew he wasn’t. The DOJ-NSD and FBI flat-out LIED.
So, Americans have a democrat juggernaut claiming ‘obstruction,’ the New York Times ‘leaking’ the Mueller Report and admitting that it’s crucial they shape the narrative so that these corrupt officials can somehow avoid jail, and a setup of a private citizens that goes straight to Obama himself.
The workings of the corrupt and treasonous unelected bureaucrats is simply mind-boggling and this bait and switch, God help the U.S., just might work.