This is a huge win for ensuring that voter rolls are accurate.

Source: MSN

Liberals are furious that the law is being followed In Wisconsin, especially in strong hold areas like Minneapolis and Madison.

Why? Because a judge has ordered that the state comply with its own regulations and purge voter rolls, which will remove hundreds of thousands of voters in the state… basically, people who have moved.

Of course, all these people have to do is reregister if they were purged improperly, but democrats are in a screaming frenzy over the rule of law.

MSN reported:

A Wisconsin judge on Friday ordered the state to remove hundreds of thousands of people from Wisconsin’s voter rolls because they may have moved.

The case is being closely watched because of the state’s critical role in next year’s presidential race. Ozaukee County Judge Paul Malloy also denied the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin’s petition to intervene.

Lawyers for the League and for the Wisconsin Elections Commission indicated they will appeal and asked Malloy to stay his ruling pending those appeals, but he declined.

At issue is a letter the state Elections Commission sent in October to about 234,000 voters who it believes may have moved. The letter asked the voters to update their voter registrations if they had moved or alert election officials if they were still at their same address.

[That’s it. So, why would democrats fight this? Could it be that they are afraid of losing the fraudulent votes they rely on?]

The commission planned to remove the letter’s recipients from the voter rolls in 2021 if it hadn’t heard from them. [This is a violation of the law in Wisconsin, and was apparently deliberate.]

But Malloy’s decision would kick them off the rolls much sooner, and well before the 2020 presidential election. [Avoiding the MSN subtle bias, basically, this means that the judge ordered the state to comply with its own legislation.]

Before Friday’s hearing, Democratic state Attorney General Josh Kaul said in an interview that quickly removing voters from the rolls would cause “clear harm to Wisconsin voters.” That’s because some people who haven’t moved would likely lose their ability to vote, at least for the time being.

“Any time people have to go through extra steps to vote, and certainly re-registering is a significant additional step, the result is that fewer people end up voting,” he said. “Fewer people will be registered. A number of people will have to re-register.”

Three voters sued the commission last month with the help of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty. They argued election officials were required to remove voters from the rolls 30 days after sending the letters if they hadn’t heard from them.

They asked Malloy to issue an injunction that would require election officials to purge their rolls. Kaul, commissioners and others say that would lead to some people getting knocked off the rolls who shouldn’t be.

But Malloy went further than issuing an injunction. In granting a writ of mandamus – essentially a court order that a government official or agency do its job – he said he was convinced the commission had a clear, positive, plain legal duty to purge the voter rolls within 30 days.

“I don’t want to see someone deactivated, but I don’t write the law,” said Malloy, who was appointed to the bench in 2002 by Republican Gov. Scott McCallum and has been re-elected by voters.

He said the commission didn’t like the policy so it set a new one without following a formal rule-making procedure that would have included notice to the public and a chance for input.

“There’s no basis for saying 12 to 24 months is a good time frame. It’s not that difficult to do it sooner,” he said near the end of a two-hour hearing. “If you don’t like (it), you have to go back to the Legislature.”

Elections officials sent the letters based on information compiled by the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, a coalition of 28 states and Washington, D.C., that tries to keep voter rolls as accurate as possible.

ERIC flags voters who file address changes with the post office or register vehicles at new addresses.

The Elections Commission, which consists of three Democrats and three Republicans, doesn’t want to immediately remove people from the voter rolls because in some cases their information is faulty and the voters haven’t moved. For instance, people could be flagged as having moved if they registered a vehicle at a business address instead of their home address.

Voters who are removed from the voter rolls, whether correctly or mistakenly, can regain the ability to cast ballots by re-registering online, at their clerk’s office or at the polls on election day.

Of the 234,000 letters that were sent, about 60,000 were returned as undeliverable as of Dec. 5, according to the Elections Commission. [Perhaps those people are no longer living there…and since the democrat governor ‘won’ the election with less than 30,000 votes, perhaps someone should check to see if these people ‘voted’ in that race?]

About 2,300 recipients of the letters said they continued to live at their address and about 16,500 had registered to vote at new addresses.

The letters went to about 7% of Wisconsin’s registered voters, but were concentrated more heavily in some parts of the state than others.

Milwaukee and Madison – the state’s Democratic strongholds – account for 14% of Wisconsin’s registered voters but received 23% of the letters.

Across the state, 55% of the letters went to municipalities where Democrat Hillary Clinton out-polled Trump in 2016.

Many Americans agree that these areas are the ones that need checked most frequently.