This judge is an elected official, meaning that people in his district can remember his actions on the next election.

Source:

On Wednesday, a local district judge (elected to the position) defied the Texas Attorney General and declared that democrats could have their mail-in (voter fraud push) because of the health “crisis.”

The Hill ‘reported’:

Texas state judge ruled Wednesday that voters who are concerned about the safety of in-person voting amid the coronavirus pandemic are eligible for mail-in voting.

The ruling was a win for the Texas Democratic Party, who sued election officials ahead of the state’s July 14 primary runoff in order to expand alternative polling options, though the decision is likely to be appealed.

Prior to the Wednesday order, only Texas voters with a “qualifying reason” — advanced age, disability, incarceration or planned travel — could mail in ballots.

But the temporary injunction from district judge Tim Sulak in Travis County, issued from the bench, expands the definition of “disability” to include those with concerns about the potential health implications of in-person voting, according to the Texas Tribune.

“Today is a victory for all Texans,” Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa said in a statement. “The right to vote is central to our democracy.”

“Our state is better off when more Texans participate in our democracy,” the statement added. “Voting by mail is safe, secure, and accessible. It allows more voters to participate in our democracy, and it’s a commonsense way to run an election, especially during a public health crisis.”

[It’s NOT a democracy… democratically elected official in a REPUBLIC.]

The temporary injunction is likely to be appealed by Texas state officials.

On Wednesday afternoon, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said that fear of the COVID-19 pandemic was not a viable reason for Texas residents to apply for an absentee ballot, setting up a clash with the district court’s ruling.

“Mail ballots based on disability are specifically reserved for those who are physically ill and cannot vote in-person as a result,” Paxton said in a statement. “Fear of contracting COVID-19 does not amount to a sickness or physical condition as required by the Legislature.”