Objective of AMA’s mission statement is to apparently insert progressive politics into plain statements of fact in the medical field.
Source: Jamie White
The American Medical Association (AMA) released a document calling on medical professionals to adopt progressive language into their practices as part of an effort to fight “racism” and “white supremacy.”
The AMA teamed up with the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Center for Health Justice to release a 54-page guide called “Advancing Health Equity: A Guide to Language, Narrative and Concepts.”
“The devastating toll of COVID-19 on communities who are minoritized and or historically marginalized, coupled with worldwide protests against racism and other systems that exclude, has brought many people and a wide spectrum of institutions into conversations about racial justice and health equity,” the document states.
“Many groups are now examining the dire statistics detailing inequities (or injustices) in health, the root causes of those statistics, and the role our institutions have played in producing and perpetuating this harm.”
The AMA’s solution to systemic “inequities” is to redefine “narratives” about “race, individualism, and meritocracy” as well as those “surrounding medicine itself.”
“Central to this work is a consideration of our language, and the narratives that shape our thinking,” the document explains. “As we explore in this guide, dominant narratives (also called malignant narratives), particularly those about ‘race,’ individualism and meritocracy, as well as narratives surrounding medicine itself, limit our understanding of the root causes of health inequities. Dominant narratives create harm, undermining public health and the advancement of health equity; they must be named, disrupted and corrected.”
That’s just the beginning.
The document goes on to praises “critical race theory” and “gender studies” as a solution to “meritocracy and individualism” and other “patriarchal narratives.”
Much is at stake in whose narratives dominate, receive traction and thrive. Narratives grounded in white supremacy and sustaining structural racism, for example, perpetuate cumulative disadvantage for some populations and cumulative advantage for white people, and especially white men. Patriarchal narratives enforce rigidly defined traditional norms, and reinforce inequities based on gender.
Narratives that uncritically center meritocracy and individualism render invisible the very real constraints generated and reinforced by poverty, discrimination and ultimately exclusion. Yet a rich tradition of work in health equity and related fields, including critical race theory (defined in the glossary), gender studies, disability studies, as well as scholarship from social medicine, gives us a foundation for an alternative narrative, one that challenges the status quo, one that moves health care towards justice.
In other words, the goal is to insert critical race theory and other progressive dogma into medical vocabulary “at the expense of clarity and accuracy,” according to New York Magazine contributor Jesse Singal.
7/ I don't think any of this is binding, but it's really striking that the AMA would spend so much of its time creating a document trying to get everyone to sound like a graduate of an elite school, often at they expense of clarity and accuracy.— Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) October 30, 2021
Read the AMA document: