Posted BY: Cassandra Fairbanks
On New Year’s Day, the state of Alabama will begin allowing people to carry concealed handguns without a permit.
A person will still be able to get a permit if they choose to do so, but it will no longer be required of them.
According to the Associated Press, the legislation states that an officer can still “temporarily take a weapon if it is necessary for the safety of the officer or others. The weapon must be returned unless there is an arrest, or the person is posing a safety threat.”
The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action says that constitutional carry is now legal in 25 states.
Trending: Watch: Putin Says ‘The West Lied About Peace’ in New Year’s Address To Russia
“It’s going to be a big step to help the average law-abiding citizen to keep them from having to go through the hoops of getting a permit to carry their weapons,” Rep. Shane Stringer, the legislation’s sponsor, told AP. “It’s not going change who can and cannot carry a gun. People that are prohibited now are still prohibited.”
The bill was quickly signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey as soon as it was passed.
The law was opposed by Alabama Sheriffs Association opposed the legislation, claiming that constitutional carry laws cause crime to rise and stop individuals from voluntarily obtaining permits.
“It’s sad that certain sheriffs are actually fighting against restoring gun rights to law-abiding Alabamians,” Dudley Brown, National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR)’s president, told Yellow Hammer News last January.
Brown continued, “Constitutional Carry laws simply recognize what we all know to be true – that the government should not force you to get a permit in order to carry a handgun.”
“Spreading lies and inciting fear in an attempt to kill a pro-gun bill is the same kind of underhanded tactics we see from radical leftists across the nation,” Brown added. “It’s a shame that many sheriffs in Alabama have resorted to this. That’s why we’re mobilizing our members in supporters in Alabama – cranking up the pressure to make Alabama the 22nd Constitutional Carry state.”
After the law was passed, Lee County Sheriff Jay Jones, president of the Alabama Sheriffs’ Association, urged people to still get permits, saying that “maintaining an Alabama concealed carry permit is wise when traveling out of state; reciprocity applies — other states may require non-residents to have a permit from their state of residence.”
I am a strong 2A supporter. However, I don’t think that this is a good idea. I know many fellow 2A allies will disagree. I have CC permits in 2 states, WA and NV. NV requires an 8 hour class that includes live fire for their permit. WA only requires a background check. If someone is going to carry a firearm or any weapon in public they need to have some training and know some basic facts. Safety and The Law in your state and other states that you might travel to especially. Without that knowledge there are too many chances for accidents or incidents that could cause public opinion to turn against firearms. Because of that I like the NV process better than the WA process. However, I would also like a provision to “challenge” the requirements in order to obtain a concealed permit. A short test and perhaps a live fire demonstration to prove that the class is not required for that applicant. For those that already know the basics and can prove that. I realize this could be an way for state governments to “shadow ban” the permitting process. So there would need to be strong language in the law to prevent that. WA and NV are both “shall issue” states and that needs to be preserved. The only difference is that NV requires the knowledge that a class and live fire demonstration can provide. WA does not. That seems to be a better system than letting any person without that knowledge be allowed to carry a firearm in public where a mistake could damage our right to self defense in the future.