Posted BY: Joe Fried
However, many citizens have doubts about whether it was fairly counted, and those doubts will not be resolved without analysis, testing, and transparent reporting. Standard ballot recounts will not suffice.
Therefore, Kari Lake, Blake Masters, and Mark Finchem, three contending Republicans who lost their elections despite polls favoring them, should consider taking the following actions, to the extent feasible and lawful:
- Request an independent signature test of a sample of mail-in ballot envelopes
With regard to the 2020 presidential election, an independent signature test was performed in January 2022, and the results were shocking. To perform the test, a panel of six judges was assembled by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT-trained engineer who was working on behalf of the Arizona State Senate. Three of the six judges were forensic document examiners and three were novices. Each judge analyzed the signatures on 499 scientifically selected early-voting mail-in ballot envelopes. All six agreed that 60 of the tested ballot envelopes had signatures that did not match the corresponding signatures in verified records. In other words, 12 percent may have been phonies.
Think about it: Three expert forensic document examiners and three other reviewers unanimously agreed that 12 percent of the signatures could not be matched to registration records. If we apply that percentage to the entire mail-in voting population of Maricopa County, it means there may have been as many as 204,000 phony ballots in the 2020 election, in just one Arizona county. That is almost twenty times Biden’s winning margin!
My understanding is that this expert was a sell-out to RINOs in the 2020. Talk with Jovan Hutton Pulitzer for his opinion on this expert.
Everything about 2022 midterm in Arizona is “in your face” fraud, a sovereign fraud.
Would also suggest that all become familiar with this article by Jay Valentine that explains how the criminals pulled off putting Biden in the Oval Office. Worked in 2020, without negative consequence to the corrupt actors. Why would they not use the same scheme in 2022? Use the below link for article.
Maricopa County has a different set of voting rules and regulations than all other counties in Arizona that played a role in the fraud.
There was one anomaly that skewed the percentage of voters to indicate that almost the same percentage of people were able to cast their vote as did in the 2018, midterm. This %number is the result of two simple numbers, the number of registered voters and the number of votes cast = % of people that voted. The anomaly was the inactive voter role enlarged to statistical improbable numbers, thereby reducing the number of registered voters used to find the percentage of people that voted—to arrive at a %number that indicates all the problems with paper, printers, tabulators and strange rules for the unusual number of people moved to inactive voter role to vote, and other County specific rules for voters to vote at a functioning location, rules which the election workers were not trained and did not know. It goes on and on.
Despite all the chaos created by the above listed problems no voter was disenfranchised as indicated by the percentage of votes cast—a miracle has taken place once again in Arizona’s Election process.