Archive for the ‘2016 US Elections’ Category

Hillary Clinton: Women Only Voted For Trump Because Their Husbands Told Them To

September 20, 2017 1 comment

Mac Slavo

Hillary Clinton’s delusions continue. It’s been almost a year since the election, and now Hillary’s blaming married women who voted for Donald Trump for her loss to the president back in November.

Still unwilling to take any responsibility for her loss to Donald Trump, Hillary continues to play the blame game.  So far, she’s blamed everyone from her most trusted advisor, Huma Abedin, to the infamous socialist and fellow democrat Bernie Sanders, for the disastrous campaign and ridiculous ideas she championed last year. But she doesn’t stop there anymore. Now it’s the fault of married women who voted for Donald Trump.

According to the Daily Wire, the quintessential modern feminist Clinton says women were too scared to stand up to their husbands, boyfriends, and fathers, who told them to vote Republican, and since, clearly, women have no agency or ability to think for themselves, they listened.  Of course, that’s according to Hillary. But she blamed socialist women as well. Clinton made the outrageous claims in an interview with NPR, where she also blamed the so-called “Bernie Bros” for bullying Democratic women into avoiding the more moderate Clinton in favor of the socialist, Bernie Sanders.

“You yourself in the book acknowledge that a good number of young women didn’t vote for you, which is presumably not a sexist choice. They just weren’t inspired by your message,” NPR’s Rachel Martin said during an interview with Clinton, out to promote her litany of excuses…er…recently released book, What Happened. “I think it’s a lot more complicated than that,” Clinton answered. “I did win the women’s vote. I didn’t win the vote of white women, but I got more white women votes than Barack Obama did,” she said.

“Women will have no empathy for you because they will be under tremendous pressure — and I’m talking principally about white women — they will be under tremendous pressure from fathers, and husbands, and boyfriends and male employers, not to vote for ‘the girl,’” she said. –Daily Wire

But Clinton also said that even though women liked and respected her (an observation American women might disagree with generally) they were too afraid to stand up to the “oppressive Patriarchial hand” that often “forces” them to hide their allegiance to womankind. Clinton also tried pretty hard to convince NPR that she is taking the blame for her loss, but no one is buying this snake oil anymore:

“I take ultimate responsibility for the loss,” Clinton said. “I was the candidate. I was the person whose name was on the ballot. And I’ll never get over that.”

And even though she lost to one of the most hated candidates of all time, Hillary Clinton is refusing to go away. “I’m not going anywhere. I have the experience, I have the insight, I have the scars that I think give me not only the right but the responsibility to speak out,” Clinton said.

Hillary Claims She Could Still Challenge Outcome of Election

September 20, 2017 Leave a comment

‘I wouldn’t rule it out,’ failed presidential candidate indicates

Hillary Clinton could still challenge the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, the former First Lady told NPR in an interview published Monday.

Discussing potential Russian interference as well as the “legitimacy of the election,” Clinton hinted that the outcome of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian collusion with the Trump campaign could force her to question the legitimacy of the election.

“I don’t know if there’s any legal constitutional way to do that. I think you can raise questions,” Clinton stated, going on to say, “There’s no doubt they influenced the election.”

The two-timed failed Democrat presidential candidate said if roles were reversed and her presidency was in question, she would definitely back an investigation.

Let me just put it this way, if I had lost the popular vote but won the electoral college and in my first day as president the intelligence community came to me and said, “The Russians influenced the election,” I would’ve never stood for it. Even though it might’ve advantaged me, I would’ve said, “We’ve got to get to the bottom of this.” I would’ve set up an independent commission with subpoena power and everything else.

Pressed on whether she would rule out challenging the election results, Clinton stated, “No, I wouldn’t rule it out,” admitting there were no clear avenues by which to pursue such a challenge.

“I just don’t think we have a mechanism,” she stated, going on to highlight the recent overturned vote in Kenya and an investigation into Brexit as examples of other unprecedented election challenges.

“So what happened in Kenya, which I’m only beginning to delve into, is that the Supreme Court there said there are so many really unanswered and problematic questions, we’re going to throw the election out and re-do it. We have no such provision in our country. And usually we don’t need it,” Hillary stated.Additionally, the former First Lady continued calling for an end to the Electoral College:

“Now, I do believe we should abolish the Electoral College, because I was sitting listening to a report on the French election and the French political analyst said, ‘You know in our country the person with the most votes wins, unlike in yours.’ And I think that’s an anachronism. I’ve said that since 2000.”

While the former secretary of state holds out a possibility of challenging President Trump’s legitimacy, she once claimed she would support a peaceful transfer of power.

At the third presidential debate in October 2016, Clinton attacked then-candidate Trump over his response to moderator Chris Wallace, who asked whether the businessman would “absolutely accept the result of this election.”

“I’ll keep you in suspense, okay?” Trump answered, a response which Clinton dubbed, “horrifying.”

“You know, every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is, is rigged against him,” Clinton told Wallace.

“We’ve been around for 240 years. We’ve had free and fair elections. We’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election.”

Hillary Lawyers Face Bar Sanctions Over Deletion of Clinton Emails

September 13, 2017 Leave a comment

Ian Mason

Maryland Circuit Judge Paul Harris refused to halt a state bar investigation of three attorneys alleged to have assisted former-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the deletion of thousands of emails in the scandal that rocked last year’s presidential race.

Judge Harris, of suburban Anne Arundel County, did not accept the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission’s determination that the complaint against the lawyers was “frivolous” and ordered an investigation to move forward. The Washington Times reported that Harris called the allegations contained in a complaint by former Department of Justice Attorney Ty Clevenger last September “egregious” and that the complaint “appears to have merit.”

Clevenger himself was accused of unethical professional behavior in his pursuit of an investigation into Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. By his own account, his complaint against Clinton’s lawyers was based on “public reports,” seemingly affirming the grievance commission’s claim that Clevenger has “no personal knowledge of the allegations.”

“There are allegations of destroying evidence,” Judge Harris announced at a Monday hearing, noting that the source of the complaint was not a reason to dismiss it. “I just think this is a rather easy decision at this point … The court is ordering bar counsel to investigate.”

David Kendall, a longtime Clinton confidant and partner for over three decades at eminent D.C. law firm Williams and Connelly; Cheryl Mills, the Deputy White House Counsel during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial who followed Hillary from the State Department to the campaign trail; and Heather Samuelson, the former HILLPAC staffer reported to have handled the screening of Hillary’s emails for preservation, all were accused of misconduct in Clevenger’s complaint.

Clevenger followed up with a lawsuit to compel an investigation in March. The Washington Times reported that another Maryland judge, Anne Arundel Circuit Judge Ronald Silkworth, had similarly refused to dismiss Clevenger’s complaint in July.

In July, 2016, then-FBI Director James Comey testified before the House Oversight and Government reform committee that Clinton attorneys with access to the server, which handled emails with classified material, lacked the security clearances needed to view such information.

An op-ed by National Review‘s Andrew McCarthy last October argued the attorneys accused of misconduct should have been treated as suspects in a wider investigation of the destruction of Clinton’s emails from her unauthorized personal server. Both received immunity deals in the course of the FBI’s and the House Judiciary Committee’s investigations of the matter.

Clinton Blames Comey, Russia, WikiLeaks, Facebook, Fake News, Voter ID Laws, Sexism, and Misogyny for Losing

September 13, 2017 Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton believes that were it not for James Comey, Russia, Wikileaks, Facebook, fake news, voter ID laws, or America’s “endemic” sexism and misogyny, she would currently be president of the United States.

In just under two minutes, Clinton rattled off eight separate excuses for losing the 2016 election.

Clinton claims that, “If the election were on October 27, I would be your president,” singling out James Comey in particular for re-opening an investigation into her mishandling of classified material. (Others notably argue that Comey kept Clinton in the campaign by preemptively exonerating Clinton before the FBI had concluded its own investigation.)

“I went from 26 points ahead to 13 points ahead, and I needed about 18 points in order to be sure to win Pennsylvania,” Clinton said of the impact of Comey’s notorious letter explaining he was re-opening the investigation. “I watched how analysts who I have a great deal of respect for, like Nate Silver, burrowed into all the data and said that ‘but for that Comey letter, she would have won.'”

“So it was very personal to me,” she said in an interview with CBS’s Jane Pauley. “I think my general election prospects were badly damaged because of that, so that even though I was starting to come back, it was not enough time to overcome it.”

Clinton also rattled off Russia, Wikileaks, and even fake news as other culprits in her failed presidential run.

“But even though [the Comey letter] was the primary blow to my campaign at the very end, it has to be looked at in context — with the Russians weaponizing information, negative stories about me; this whole Wikileaks beginning to leak in early October of John Podesta’s emails — which if you read them all were, they’re pretty anodyne, but they were taken out of context; stories were made up about them.”

Clinton then cited a recent story about Facebook accepting advertising from a Russian firm as another reason for her loss.

“We now know that Facebook was taking money from Russian companies to run negative stories about me,” she continued. “If you look at all of this, yes, it affected me and my campaign. But I am more concerned now going forward that we haven’t come to grips with what it means for future elections.”

In comments that echo Donald Trump’s claims that the votes from illegal aliens affected the vote totals, Clinton likewise claims that Republican-led “voter suppression” enabled Trump to win toss-up states.

“I would also add that the voter suppression that we now know had been in the works and really put into effect in a lot of states like Wisconsin and North Carolina, etc., played a role,” she said.”

And she blamed America’s “sexism and misogyny, which are endemic to our society. And certainly as I write in my chapter called ‘On Being a Woman in Politics,’ have to be factored in as well.”

RELATED: Clinton Bizarrely Lists Putin’s ‘White’ Race First Among His Negative Qualities

Amazon, Walmart slash Hillary Clinton’s ‘What Happened’ 40% — before Tuesday release

September 13, 2017 Leave a comment

Two huge booksellers, Amazon and Walmart, have already cut the price of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2016 tell-all by 40 percent — and it isn’t even available yet.

Set to be released Tuesday, both have priced “What Happened?” at $17.99.

Publisher Simon and Schuster set a price of $30.

Much of what’s in her book has already been reported on, thanks to leaked copies of the Democratic presidential candidate’s latest work.

The price cut, however, has likely helped to boost sales. It is No. 1 on Amazon.

Hillary: Private Email Server My ‘Most Important’ Mistake

September 12, 2017 Leave a comment

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton says “the most important” mistake she made that lead to her 2016 election defeat was the use of personal email as secretary of state.

It hurts a lot,” Hillary tells TV journalist Jane Pauley, after 10 months trying to figure out how she lost an easy victory. reports:

In her first television interview to promote her new book Clinton told interviewer Jane Pauley of CBS that using personal email while she was Secretary of State was the thing that had the most detrimental effect on her election bid.

FBI director James Comey revealed in October 2016 that the FBI had started investigating newly discovered emails. He would soon say though the investigation did not warrant any charges. But that was enough to do the damage.

I think the most important of the mistakes I made was using personal email,” Clinton told Pauley.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, that was my responsibility. It was presented in such a negative way, and I never could get out from under it. And it never stopped.

I had not drafted concession speech

Clinton also told Pauley about election night and what she did when it became apparent she wasn’t going to win.

I just went into the bedroom, laid down on the bed, i just thought ‘Okay. I just have to wait this out.’ But then, midnight, I decided, well, ‘you know it looks like it’s not going to work.’

Clinton then called Trump to congratulate him on being elected and followed that up with a call to President Obama. She said she felt the need to make that call because she felt that she had “let everyone down.

The next morning brought the task of facing the nation in defeat, something Hillary had not prepared for.

I had not drafted a concession speech,” she admitted. “I had been working on a victory speech.

‘Basket of deplorables’

Hillary also offered an explanation of the infamous “basket of deplorables” label she put on Trump supporters.

Well, I thought Trump was behaving in a deplorable manner,” she explained.

I thought a lot of his appeals to voters was deplorable. I thought his behaviour, as we saw on the Access Hollywood tape, was deplorable. And there were a large number of people who didn’t care. It did not matter to them. And he turned out to be a very effective reality TV star.

When Pauley said that this merely energized some people and offended others who didn’t personally feel deplorable at all Clinton adamantly stressed that she didn’t buy that narrative.

‘Done with being candidate’

During the interview broadcast on Sunday the 69-year-old drew a line under her future as a candidate but insisted she isn’t finished in politics.

I am done with being a candidate. But I am not done with politics because I literally believe that our country’s future is at stake.

She also opened up about the continued hurt she feels following her stunning loss to Donald Trump.

I am good,” Clinton said to Pauley, “but that doesn’t mean that I am complacent or resolved about anything what happened. It still is very painful. It hurts a lot.

Video Emerges Of Hillary’s TRUE Feelings Regarding Illegal Children, Liberals Hide

September 10, 2017 Leave a comment

Sources: The Conservative Daily PostMedia-ite

Only this week the Conservative Daily Post highlighted the hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer (D-NY) who openly supported President Trump’s stance on the DACA before now coming out in favor of the horrendous Obama-era travesty. It was addressed in depth how the New York liberal simply went with the tide as long as it was against Trump.

Now the queen of all liars, Hillary Clinton, has a video which shows her doing the exact same thing. Media-ite posted the proof of her true feelings with a video “of a 2014 interview between her and CNN’s Christiane Amanpour” where the former First Lady was trying to peddle her book. “Hard Choices.” Liberals are hiding from the very words they didn’t want to be remembered.

At the time, the failed SCOTUS said that the U.S. “was a nation of laws and that they probably had to go,” and yet today, she and her party all but crucify Donald Trump for agreeing with her. As observed before, this why the America’s leader once supported the Crooked one. It is her that has changed, not Mr. Trump.

We have to send a clear message, just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay,” said Clinton. “So, we don’t want to send a message that is contrary to our laws or will encourage more children to make that dangerous journey.

When asked by the host if they needed to be sent back, the former Senator from New York said, “Well, they should be sent back as soon as it can be determined who responsible adults in their families are, because there are concerns whether all of them should be sent back. But I think all of them who can be should be reunited with their families.”

That sure sounds a lot like Mr. Trump. Today, Clinton acts of if those words make someone a NAZI worthy of being beaten by ANTIFA who her party supports.

The sneaky Democrat also claimed as the cameras rolled that “the numbers are increasing dramatically. And the main reason I believe why that’s happening is that the violence in certain of those Central American countries is increasing dramatically.”


She added, “And there is not sufficient law enforcement or will on the part of the governments of those countries to try to deal with this exponential increase in violence, drug trafficking, the drug cartels, and many children are fleeing from that violence,” but admitted that they needed to be sent back lest more arrive.

The fact is that Clinton believes whatever her party tells her to believe. Supporting her for her stances is like supporting the wind for its strength during a storm. She stands firmly for nothing.

That is why she lost.

%d bloggers like this: