Archive for the ‘Gun Control’ Category

U.S. appeals court upholds Maryland’s ban on assault rifles

February 23, 2017 Leave a comment

Assault-style rifles hang on display inside a Dallas, Texas gun shop, September 13, 2004. REUTERS/Jeff Mitchell  JM

REUTERS/Jeff Mitchell JM

A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Maryland’s ban on assault rifles, ruling gun owners are not protected under the U.S. Constitution to possess “weapons of war,” court documents showed.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided 10-4 that the Firearm Safety Act of 2013, a law in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, by a gunman with an assault rifle, does not violate the right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.

“Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war,” Judge Robert King wrote, referring to the “military-style rifles” that were also used during mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado, San Bernardino, California, and Orlando, Florida.

These are “places whose names have become synonymous with the slaughters that occurred there,” he wrote, noting that the Supreme Court’s decision in the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case excluded coverage of assault weapons.

The United States has among the most permissive gun rights in the world. Because the U.S. Congress has long been a graveyard for gun control legislation, some states and localities have enacted their own measures.

In total, seven states and the District of Columbia have laws that ban semiautomatic rifles, several of which that have faced various court challenges as there is a longstanding legal debate over the scope of Second Amendment rights.

Four appeal courts have rejected Second Amendment challenges to bans on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, King wrote.

In 2015, U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake upheld Maryland’s law that bans the AR-15 and other military-style rifles and shotguns and limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds, but a smaller panel of circuit court judges reversed her ruling in 2016. The case could be eventually be heard by the Supreme Court.

The majority “has gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms,” Judge William Traxler wrote in the dissent of the ruling released on Tuesday.


Report: Obama Issued A Massive Ammunition Ban Just One Day Before He Left Office

January 25, 2017 Leave a comment

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe, an Obama appointee, ordered a new ammunition ban for certain federal lands on Thursday–his last full day in office

Report: Obama Issued A Massive Ammunition Ban Just One Day Before He Left Office

In early December SHTFplan contributor Jeremiah Johnson warned the inauguration was still a long way off and that we should never underestimate a Marxist with an army of oligarchs to lean on. It turns out that Johnson’s warnings were right on target, as we have learned over the last couple of weeks that President Obama and officials in his administration moved feverishly to implement new rules and regulations with last minute initiatives.

One such regulation, which seemingly disappeared within the hustle and bustle of inauguration day, was a new order issued by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe just 12 hours before our new President was sworn into office.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe, an Obama appointee, ordered a new ammunition ban for certain federal lands on Thursday–his last full day in office.

The ban, which took effect immediately, eliminates the use of lead-based ammunition on federal lands like national parks and wildlife refuges, as well as any other land administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service.The ban is expected to have a major impact on much of the hunting that takes place on federal lands across the United States as lead-based ammunition is widely legal and used throughout the country.

Ashe said the order was necessary to protect wildlife from exposure to lead.

Source: The Free Beacon Via Survival Blog

That may seem like a big win for the anti-gun left, but The National Shooting Sports Foundation has already leapt into action:

“This directive is irresponsible and driven not out of sound science but unchecked politics,” said Lawrence Keane, the group’s senior vice president. “The timing alone is suspect. This directive was published without dialogue with industry, sportsmen, and conservationists. The next director should immediately rescind this and, instead, create policy based upon scientific evidence of population impacts with regard to the use of traditional ammunition.”

As we noted earlier, President Trump has a lot of work to do to reverse the damage caused by the Obama administration.

Reversing this asinine ammunition ban is a good start.

REPORT: Final Stats Show The REAL Numbers Behind Obama’s “Genius” Gun Control Policies

January 12, 2017 Leave a comment


Facts have been presented showing that there is an amazing amount of truth in what the pro-Second Amendment movement has been saying in regards to gun-free zones in the Land of the Free. Everyone smarter than a post, or at least than Joe Biden, knew that gun-free zones were havens for those who wish to inflict the maximum amount of misery with no one shooting back at them. And guess what? We were all correct.

Ninety-eight percent–that is how much more often a mass shooting happens in a gun-free zone than in areas where people are allowed to protect themselves as they see fit. This study did not include gang violence, which not only is not motivated by the same outcome as mass shootings or acts of terror, but are usually targeted. Gangs often use illegal guns too, so for those two reasons, gangs do not equate into the number.


This information should be shown to everyone who has been trying so hard to make (what is now proven to be) targets out of everyone by removing guns from the public at every opportunity. This is why we are seeing states such as Florida move to allow guns in government buildings and airports.

After the truth was seen that taking guns away from travelers in Florida lead to a mass killing of them as they died defenseless at the airport, this may prove to be one of the most prudent moves that we have seen in terms of public safety and defense in years.

Kentucky, home of Senator Rand Paul, is looking at changing the rules to allow guns in schools there, which will go a long way in limiting the amount of damage that a shooter will do, if God forbid that should ever arise. There are very good reasons why the Second Amendment exists, and much of it has nothing to do with hunting or taking over the government, which is always heard.

The Second Amendment means that a small, frail person can walk down the street and not have to be unprotected nor open for attack. This is the basis of protecting one’s God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Flash mobs exist that see homes and stores overrun with tens, sometimes hundreds of looters, so people may feel the need to have more than ten bullets in a gun in order to be safe. That is the person’s right to do so, just as it is the right of a woman who gets off from work at three in the morning to greet any possible attacker with something more than pepper spray and a rape whistle.

By the way, someone let the left know that rape whistles don’t work so well in the age of central air, closed doors, and surround sound systems. They will never figure it out if we don’t tell them.

Let us imagine that a handful of responsible gun owners had a gun on hand during the most recent shooting at the Florida airport. Without a doubt, someone was likely going to lose their lives that day no matter what because, unlike what the media says about most gun owners,  just because someone has a gun on them does not mean that they are planning to use it.

Any gun owner would have been just as busy checking bags, dodging cell phone walkers, and paying for overpriced coffee as anyone who did not have a gun. Therefore, when the madman opened fire, the shock factor was still going to kill at least someone, if not many “someones”.


However, from there on out, that is where the story would have most likely changed to a very large degree. Once the first victims had fallen and the running began, a responsible conceal and carry gun owner would have been on alert. If he or she had a clear shot, which is unlikely but possible, they would have taken it. Contrary to popular belief, gun classes do not teach to ever fire if the shot is not clear, such as would have been the case with the initial panicked running. Still, once people started hitting the ground in an effort to not be a target, things would have changed.

The gunman was reported to have stood over those who cowered on the ground as a defense and simply fired his weapon into the sea of bodies while looming over them. This means that there was quite likely a clear shot once this happened. If so, at least some of those that died on the floor could have been saved. Second of all, if one or two of the people on the ground had a gun (assuming that they had ducked or were playing dead), they could have really had a fighting chance.


If this sounds like a bit too much of a “wild west scenario” for many to be comfortable with, are we more comfortable with a “horror movie scenario”? Gunmen who want to kill people have a terrible track record when it comes to obeying gun laws, so this approach is clearly not working. If it did work, then we would not see a 98% higher number of these crimes in places where no one except the law breaker can kill someone. There is no reason why we can not trust the vast majority of our fellow citizens to have a gun when we already know that the vast minority of us (killers) will certainly not be worthy of the trust to pull back.

It was Robert Heilein who said most astutely that an armed society is a polite society, and there are jewels of logic to be mined within those words. If guns are taken away from the people, then in areas where criminals plan, life becomes the survival of the fittest. When guns were taken by China, Russia, and Germany, it lead directly to the worst genocides of the 20th century.

It is time to understand that instead of banning guns, we need to be teaching the value and respect FOR guns. Our very lives may depend upon it someday.


Dems Calling For Complete Gun Control Zone After Florida Airport Killing, Don’t Realize It Already Was

January 11, 2017 Leave a comment


Unfortunately, we had a tragedy during the opening days of the New Year. On January 6, 2017, the nation saw a mass shooting in the Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International airport. A gunman went through baggage claim and opened fire, shooting 13 people and killing five of them.

The nation was quick to mourn, as the top political leaders sent their thoughts and prayers to the people that were affected. President-Elect Donald Trump tweeted out his sympathies, as did Senator Marco Rubio and House Speaker Paul Ryan and a number of other Senators.

Normally this would have been enough and the people of the nation would gladly accept this. However, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence decided to open their mouth and tweet at the President-Elect, as well as the other elected officials that they didn’t need their thoughts and prayers.

Again, they decided to say that they we need to have more gun control in the United States so that these tragedies could be avoided. Oh, and they really played it up this time. The Brady Campaign sent out tweets saying that thoughts and prayers are not the solution, and they were actually “tired of [his] thoughts and prayers” when referencing House Speaker Ryan.

Trump tweeted out, “Monitoring the terrible situation in Florida. Just spoke to Governor Scott. Thoughts and prayers for all. Stay safe!” There was nothing wrong with that, as it was just a tweet to remind the people of Florida that the future president is going to make sure they are okay.


That was too much for the Brady Campaign, as they sent back, “.@realDonaldTrump We don’t need #thoughtsandprayers – we need commitment to take action & pass life-saving gun laws,” as well as a link to Trump’s original tweet. They also did the same thing to the other Republicans that decided to speak out against the terrible tragedy.


The founder of Micheal Bloomberg-funded Moms Demand Action, Shannon Watts, carried out their message as well. She tweeted out, “If thoughts and prayers solved gun violence, America wouldn’t have the highest rate of gun violence of all developed nations.”

However, let’s focus on that last claim. The claim that America has “the highest rate of gun violence of all developed nations” is actually just part of a distraction. Think about this for a second: Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood airport is a gun-free zone. In other words, they have 100 percent gun control.


So they’re calling for more gun control in an area that already had 100% gun control? That literally doesn’t make any sense at all! If anything, they should be pushing for the opposite, as in less gun control. That would be the only thing that makes sense!

Consider what happened at the end of November on the campus of Ohio State University. It was there that a terrorist actually drove his car onto the sidewalk, hit a bunch of students, got OUT of the car, and attempted to stab the survivors. Do you know the reason why only 11 people were hurt and nobody except the terrorist died?

That was because a police officer, WITH A GUN, was present and shot the guy right away. However can you imagine what would have happened if he wasn’t there right away? There could have been countless deaths. That was why Ohio, much to the chagrin of the Brady Campaign, passed a conceal carry act that makes sure this situation will never happen again.

Or if that doesn’t work, consider this. The other locations that have had total gun control have been the areas that were locations for other mass shootings. Gee that total gun control really helped out didn’t it? For example, Sandy Hook Elementary, Umpqua Community College, Fort, Hood, the Lafayette and Aurora movie theaters, and the Orlando Pulse night club were all areas that had 100 percent gun control.

Add the airport to this list and you have a pretty good case for wanting to have gun control abolished. Seriously anyone that was armed could have stopped these people. The people that committed these heinous acts are CRIMINALS. They are not going to abide by the law and the people that are going to suffer the most are the law-abiding citizens.

It didn’t matter what occurred, such as that Ohio State attack. Liberals are going to ask for total gun control no matter what happens. Again, the only gun that was involved in the Ohio State attack was the one that killed the terrorist. So what were liberals yelling for? The total removal of guns. They really have no logic whatsoever.


Not to mention that cities that have the strictest gun laws often experience the most amount of crimes. That is because criminals don’t care about obeying the law. As a result, Chicago, which does have one of the strictest gun laws in the United States, saw a record wave of shootings over Christmas. Again, gun control really works doesn’t it?

Share this article to show that liberals are now asking for total gun control in areas that already have it. They don’t realize that gun control DOESN’T WORK. Name me a time when criminals obeyed the law. I’ll wait.

Chicago Boasts Strictest Gun Laws, Experiences Record Wave Of Shootings Over Christmas

December 30, 2016 Leave a comment


The streets of Chicago are awash in blood. More than 60 people were shot over Christmas weekend alone. The struggling city witnessed a record 735 homicides in 2016.

“We had a reprehensible amount of shootings and murders,” Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said this week. “Many,” he continued, “were deliberate and planned shootings by one gang against another. They were targeted knowing fully well that individuals would be at homes of family and friends celebrating the holidays. This was followed by several acts of retaliation.”

Chicago is in the grip of the sternest gun control laws in the country. Yet so many shootings occur that the city’s earned the apt nickname “Chiraq.”


During his campaign, President-elect Donald Trump often used Chicago as an example of a city suffering under failed liberal policies. Gun control doesn’t work. Poverty is the real driver of violence, and that won’t be fixed by a misguided law.

Speaking in Chicago over Thanksgiving, another bloody weekend, the Rev. Jesse Jackson said “Poverty is a weapon of mass destruction. There’s 700 empty spaces at the the Thanksgiving table. That’s 700 heartbreaking reasons why we must recommit and redouble our efforts to stop the violence and eradicate poverty in urban and rural America.”

In 2016, Chicago recorded more murders than New York City and Los Angeles combined. Residents in the South and West areas of the city live a lifestyle more suited to a developing country. While Democrats have been wasting time with failed measures, the city’s ghettos have continued to deteriorate.


Where are the Black Lives Matters protests? The violence in Chicago overwhelmingly affects blacks. Far more minorities are gunned down by thugs in Chicago’s South Side than are harassed or brutalized by police.

“If you look at a place like Chicago … it’s got the single toughest gun laws in the United States and it’s a disaster they’re having in certain areas of Chicago,” Trump said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. “Chicago is sort of a tale of two of cities. But in certain areas of Chicago, there’s tremendous gun violence. More than just about any place.”

Trump put his finger on the problem. Liberals bleating about gun control has done nothing but impinge upon the 2nd Amendment rights of honest citizens.

“If you look we actually have strong laws on the books. And again, you look at places like Chicago. Look at New York City. In New York City, we have among the toughest gun laws in the country and we have gun violence. It’s a real problem. But we have the laws. So you have to make the laws work. The government is not making the laws work. But beyond that, you do have a huge mental health problem. There’s no question about it,” Trump said.

The national murder rate, while historically low, is projected to rise by at least 13 percent this year. Nearly half of that increase is attributable to Chicago.

Almost all of the violence springs from gangs. Teen boys slaughter each other to appear tough and fit in. Adult men kill to settle scores or establish new territory. A generation of poor Chicago boys are trapped in a never-ending cycle of violence.

Tensions that have simmered for years finally boiled over in 2016. This year witnessed a staggering increase in the city’s murder rate. Experts believe that agitators like the BLM protesters are partly responsible for the surge in violence.

“Over the past 18 months, the drawdown of police…has led to an explosion of violence not seen in almost 20 years—in August, 90 people were killed. It’s as if Chicago pulled its firefighters off a massive blaze and now residents are watching the flames engulf the entire city” writes NewsWeek.

Liberals are exacerbating the problems in Chicago by allowing distrust between cops and citizens to fester. Police cannot properly protect a city that doesn’t trust them.

Chicago is already on Trump’s radar. He has a real plan for cleaning up the city- create jobs. Many young men drift into gangs because they feel like they have no other options. Provide them with an outlet to a new life, and many boys would refrain from picking up a gun.

The changes will be slow and grueling. The problems are deeply entrenched. Yet, they can be solved. There is hope for Chicago’s poorer residents. They don’t need to tear each other apart, their lives can be expanded beyond their own cramped neighborhoods. What they need to thrive is better opportunities, which can be granted through improved schooling and employment opportunities.

Trump’s pro-business agenda is set to increase jobs and his school voucher program intends to allow poorer parents the choice of where to send their children to school.

Chicago is a city teetering on the edge of destruction. Crime rates are rising rather than falling. The Democrats plan to save the city has failed. It’s time to see what conservatives can do.

California Just Passed Emergency Gun Control Takeover, All Large Weapons Now Banned

December 21, 2016 Leave a comment



“If it’s not one thing it’s another.”

That was something I heard my dad say a hundred times if I heard it a single time.


If it’s not the weather, it’s the car.

If it’s not your kids’ grades, it’s their health.

If it’s not a new change at work, it’s a new problem at home.

And round and round it goes.

Part of growing up, of course, is learning to “dance” with the rabbit punches like these that life throws you. Being an adult–to say nothing of being a successful adult!–means keeping your “head on a swivel,” as they say in the military.

We teach kids to look both ways before they cross the street. But when you become an adult, you need to look left, right, up, down, and basically all around–situational awareness, in other words. And even when we’re not literally crossing the road, but are entering a new job, relationship, financial arrangement, country, or whatever, we still need to have our head on a swivel, be aware that we’re not always aware.

Likewise, we teach kids not to talk to strangers,but as adults we also need to learn how to talk to strangers and how to talk friends. We have to learn how and when to say what (or what not) to whom. As a victim of fraud, I have learned the hard way that sometimes the friendliest voice can be masking the darkest intentions.

This is true in familiar surroundings, too. In fact, if you look at the murder, accident, and violence statistics, most assaults and accidents happen to people in places and around people they know. When you get too familiar with your surroundings, or with people around you, your head slows down on the swivel, you start glancing in only one or two directions when crossing one of life’s streets, and that’s when you step on the proverbial landmine (or at least, banana peel).

The point of this friendly reminder is that, as conservative adults, we need to keep our heads on a swivel as liberals regroup under President Trump.

If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

If it’s not one liberal tactic, it’s another.

As a recent Tribunist article puts it:

Second Amendment advocates had much to celebrate after this year’s election. The Republican landslide is a virtual guarantee of vast improvements in gun rights. Constitutional carry is high on the list of reform, and others are pushing hard for a repeal of the National Firearms Act.

Sounds rosy, right? Sounds like we’re about to cross the street into a new, gun-friendly future. We can relax a bit; after all, having our heads on a swivel the past eight years has been exhusting–we desrve a little rest.

Not so fast, kiddies.

Even as the future looks bright, “California is about to enact major new restrictions that strip away gun rights.”

As the Tribunist writer explains,

This latest push centers around an already controversial magazine ban. In six months, there may be no ‘high capacity’ mags in California (except, of course, for those owned by criminals, police, and those in the military). … Gun control proponents look at a 30-round magazine … as “high-capacity” or “large capacity.” California has led the way in this charge to limit the availability of 30-round magazines, and set the number of rounds a magazine can hold at a much lower point.

Specifically, on December 15–when most conservatives had their head swiveled onto the rise of Donald Trump and the flood of salty liberal tears trying to wash it away–California announced a new “emergency” ban on what they call “large capacity” magazines.

Under the new law, gun owners have six months to dispose of or permanently alter their large-capacity magazines.

The options are pretty standard:

(1) remove the large-capacity magazine from the state;

(2) sell the large-capacity magazine to a licensed firearms dealer;

(3) destroy the large-capacity magazine; or

(4) surrender the large-capacity magazine to a law enforcement agency for destruction.

But in a word, they all say the same thing: “Surrender.”

Surrender your arms.

And by surrendering your arms, surrender your Second Amendment rights.

Think about it: by banning so-called “high capacity” magazines, this law is literally trying to lower the capacity of guns as self-defense items. The law, in other words, is literally trying to reduce the capacity–i.e., the ability–of gun owners to defend themselves.

And, of course, once this law passes, and the people get used to it, and the number of anti-gun citizens keeps growing, the next time around a law will be introduced that re-defines “high capacity” magazines down to 25 rounds… 20 rounds… 10 rounds… until eventually there is “0 capacity” for self defense.

Critics of this new law have pointed out the common problem with liberal anti-gun measures: the only people who will pay attention to this law are the law abiding citizens of California! For every law-abiding gun owner who surrenders his Constitutional right to self-defense, there is one scofflaw with a gun to violate the unarmed. As always, those who break laws will continue to ignore this law, which is why “well meaning” liberal laws are actually a punishment for the law-abiding and a shelter for the lawless.

If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

If it’s not California thumbing its nose at President Trump by defending all its sanctuary cities, it’s California trying to remove Americans’ right to defend themselves from whoever gets to enjoy sanctuary in those “gun-free” cities.

Congress Just Made A BOLD Move For Gun Control, The 2nd Amendment Now Means THIS

December 8, 2016 Leave a comment



It’s been a little over a month since the country has decided that Donald Trump will be the next president of the United States. In that time, Trump has been hard at work choosing the members of his cabinet carefully and working diligently to correct the problems we have seen these past eight years.

But it isn’t only the President-Elect that is hard at work. On Election Day it was confirmed that the Republicans would have control of the House and the Senate as well as the White House. In sports terms, it was a clean sweep by the GOP over the Democrats.

And since then there have been Congress members that have been at work trying to think of some new bills that are going to be voted on during the upcoming months. And one of the Republican members of Congress has announced his plans for the newest bill he wants to introduce.


North Carolina Republican Representative Richard Hudson has said that he is going to introduce legislation that would affect concealed carry members all over the country. And it isn’t the first time that he has tried to introduce something like this. Hudson tried to introduce a similar bill back in February of 2015.

But this new legislation is going to be known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. As you can probably imagine, it is going to directly affect those people that have a permit for a concealed carry permit. But since this is coming from a Republican, it isn’t going to take away your rights.

Essentially what the bill is going to do is allow a person with a concealed carry license from one state to actually carry a concealed handgun in any other state that allows their residents to concealed carry.

There are some basic restrictions, including not allowing someone to carry a gun if they are banned from possessing or even transporting a firearm under federal law. The bill also excludes carrying “a machine gun or destructive device,” and the person must follow “the restrictions of that state.”


Again those aren’t bad restrictions to have. They are pretty basic and necessary to ensure that nobody gets hurt. And they respect the rights of the Second Amendment, which is finally receiving the respect that it deserves, considering that it has been chewed up and spit out under eight years of Obama.


Hudson also talked about the legislation. “Our Second Amendment right doesn’t disappear when we cross state lines, and I plan to introduce legislation in the first days of the 115th Congress to guarantee that. The Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 is a common sense bill to provide law-abiding citizens the right to conceal carry and travel freely between states without worrying about conflicting state codes or onerous civil suits.”

He later added, “As a member of President-elect Trump’s Second Amendment Coalition, I look forward to working with the administration to advance policies that support and protect our right to keep and bear arms.” As stated before, the Democrats have been spitting on the Second Amendment for the past eight years, so this is a welcomed sight.


Hudson wasn’t the only member to try and introduce a bill like this before. Other members, like Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn, have introduced national concealed carry legislation in the past, but that was when Democrats held the majority in the upper chamber.

He also didn’t make any indication if there was any plan to re-introduce his legislation next year. But considering that the Republicans control the House, Senate, and the White House, it certainly has a great chance to be passed.

A source confirmed that Hudson’s office has been working on the bill for a while and “thinking about what we are going to do in the new year and we plan to introduce the bill from this Congress with the addition of constitutional carry in the first days of the 115th Congress.”

Trump was able to win the support of Second Amendment supporters, thanks in part to the National Rifle Association. He also promised during his campaign to push an expansion of gun rights under his administration. The NRA was naturally all for this.


Wayne LaPierre, the chief executive of the NRA, said in a video following the November 8 election, “This is our historic moment to go on offense and to defeat the forces that have aligned against our freedom once and for all. The individual right to carry a firearm in defense of our lives and our families does not and should not end at any state line.”

But the fight for gun control is going to be a long one. Democrats have already won victories that have tightened gun and ammunition restrictions in New York, Connecticut, Colorado, Nevada, California, and Washington state in recent years. And you can be sure that they are going to keep up the fight against guns.

But liberals have embarrassed themselves when it comes to gun control recently. A couple weeks ago, the Ohio State terrorist was out trying to kill people. And naturally the liberals tried to claim that he was using a gun to go and kill people. They were ADAMENT in their claims. There was a giant problem though. The terrorist used a car and a knife. He never touched a gun. It’s an embarrassment that is going to live on.

But they did have a serious threat against the Second Amendment before. Back before the election, Hillary Clinton made it a promise to sue all the firearm companies that had a gun involved in a crime. But the biggest problem with that is the fact that the gun manufacturers are not responsible for what their buyers do. It makes about as much sense as suing Ford for crashing your car.

Share this article with your friends and family to show that real legislation is coming to affect gun control laws in the country. Soon enough we will be able to have concealed carry in areas that we should have had it and not worry about breaking state laws. It’s common sense and it’s about time that it was enacted.

%d bloggers like this: