Posted BY: Teresa | NwoReport

In a notable shift, the concept of “population collapse” has transitioned from being dismissed as a right-wing conspiracy theory to being acknowledged as a potential positive for the planet. The Telegraph has chosen Oxford Professor Sarah Harper, a prominent WEF advisor, to convey this new perspective. Overlooked in her credentials is her role on the Global Agenda Council on Ageing Societies at the World Economic Forum.

Prof. Harper asserts that the decline in fertility rates in affluent countries should be viewed positively. She highlights how reduced childbirth rates in these countries could alleviate the issue of overconsumption that currently plagues the world, ultimately benefiting the environment. This is particularly significant as affluent nations tend to contribute substantially more to carbon emissions due to their higher consumption levels.

Trending: Significant 74% Reduction in COVID-19 Excess Deaths Found in Study

However, a perplexing inconsistency arises. While advocating for population reduction to curb emissions, there’s an increasing trend of immigration accounting for a larger share of births in these very countries. In the UK, for instance, almost a third of children born last year were to mothers from outside the country. This phenomenon contradicts the notion of decreasing carbon footprints through birth reduction, as immigrants often pursue higher consumption patterns, larger families, and the so-called “dream” of affluent living.

The puzzling question that emerges is whether there’s a misalignment between stated goals and actions. Why encourage immigration from less developed countries to wealthier ones if the aim is to decrease carbon emissions through population decline? This discrepancy remains hard to decipher, and it poses a challenge to comprehending the true intentions of Professor Harper and the WEF.

This complex issue reveals an underlying tension between environmental objectives and demographic shifts. It’s a conundrum that raises questions about the motivations behind these seemingly contradictory actions and calls for a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics at play. As the world grapples with the urgency of climate change, reconciling these conflicting approaches becomes vital for developing effective strategies that genuinely contribute to a sustainable future.