Posted BY: RM | NwoReport
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed a controversial revelation about the COVID-19 vaccines, challenging their categorization as messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Renz alleges that these vaccines are, in fact, created using modified messenger RNA (modRNA) technology, which can lead to lasting genetic alterations. Renz’s claims have sparked controversy and accusations that regulatory bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Pfizer have misled the public about the true nature of the vaccines.
Renz’s assertion centers on the distinction between traditional mRNA and modRNA. He argues that modRNA, unlike naturally occurring mRNA, is a laboratory-manipulated version designed to bring about genetic changes. He suggests that modRNA’s durability and capacity for permanent gene alterations raise concerns about potential unintended consequences in human genetic code.
Trending: Significant 74% Reduction in COVID-19 Excess Deaths Found in Study
Pfizer’s labeling and documentation, as pointed out by Renz, do mention “modRNA” in relation to the vaccine’s components. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine utilizes nucleoside-modified messenger RNA encoding the spike glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which triggers an immune response in the body to fight the virus. Renz also highlights reported side effects of the vaccine, ranging from pain at the injection site to fever. Additionally, he raises concerns about severe allergic reactions, myocarditis, and pericarditis following vaccine administration.
However, experts and authors like Klaus Steger have criticized Renz’s claims, emphasizing the scientific differences between mRNA and modRNA. They argue that modRNA technology offers improved stability and efficiency for therapeutic applications, including vaccines and gene therapy. The concern for allergic reactions and autoimmune responses, as well as the impact of new virus variants, are subjects of ongoing research and monitoring.
The debate around Renz’s allegations highlights the need for clear and accurate information about vaccine technology and potential side effects. While his claims challenge the established narrative, experts assert that the vaccines are based on advanced scientific principles and that thorough research is being conducted to address concerns and ensure public safety. As the conversation unfolds, it underscores the importance of transparency, scientific integrity, and comprehensive communication to build public trust in vaccine technologies.
