Posted BY: Teresa | NwoReport

As the new fiscal year approaches and Congress struggles to pass government appropriations bills, the House Freedom Caucus, a coalition of conservative congressmembers, is making a stand. They have vowed to reject any spending measure that doesn’t address several key issues. First, they seek to counter leftist policies within the Pentagon and halt what they perceive as the “weaponization” of the Justice Department and FBI. Additionally, they are pushing for the inclusion of the “Secure the Border Act of 2023” to address border security concerns.

The Freedom Caucus emphasizes its commitment to restoring the FY 2022 spending level of $1.471 trillion without resorting to budgetary gimmicks or reallocating funds. They aim to reduce the bureaucracy to its pre-COVID size while ensuring adequate defense funding. However, with government funding set to expire on September 30, they express concern over the limited time available to pass all 12 appropriations bills. This prompts them to reject short-term funding extensions, known as Continuing Resolutions, that would perpetuate Democrats’ high COVID-era spending and fail to hold the Biden Administration accountable.

Trending: Exploring Pfizer-BioNTech’s Innovative Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA (modRNA) Technology for COVID-19 Vaccines: Unveiling Insights from Pfizer Documents

The group stands firm against a familiar strategy of passing a series of short-term funding extensions, which historically leads to a massive omnibus spending package at year’s end. They pledge to use procedural tools to prevent such an outcome and avoid what they describe as a “monstrous, budget-busting, pork-filled, lobbyist handout omnibus spending bill.” In addition, the Freedom Caucus opposes granting a blank check for Ukraine in any supplemental appropriations bill.

In summary, the House Freedom Caucus is determined to ensure that government funding measures address their concerns about Pentagon policies, the Justice Department and FBI, and border security. They reject short-term funding extensions and express their intent to use procedural methods to prevent the passage of large spending bills that they deem excessive and inefficient.