Posted BY: Ted Noel
Kari Lake has just lost her trial to overturn the election in Arizona. She presented uncontroverted testimony that the dimensions of the ballot on Election Day were changed from the dimensions that were tested before the election. This caused the ballot readers great difficulty, since they are programmed to look for marks in specific locations, and the size change moved those marks. This then led to great confusion, delays, and departure of voters who could not continue to wait their turn. Those non-voting voters were mostly in dark red areas, so the “errors” disenfranchised Republicans.
Lake presented uncontroverted testimony that the printers were reset to print on different-sized paper, showing that election officials knew that there was a problem. She presented even more uncontroverted testimony that election officials did not tally the total number of ballots before transmitting them to the central office, contrary to bright letter regulations and law. And finally, she presented uncontroverted testimony that over a quarter million ballots were counted but had no chain of custody, again contrary to law. That “oversight” could allow many thousands of ballots—not votes—to be snuck in to be counted.
Trending: Doctor: CDC removing Covid vax injury data from VAERS
As Kari Lake noted, the election was run “outside the law.” Yet Maricopa County Judge Peter Thompson ruled that Lake didn’t meet her burden of proof. He relied on case law that says:
- Lake had to prove that the outcome was affected by the irregular conduct of the election.
- Lake had to prove her case by clear and convincing evidence of misconduct by election officials “intended to affect the result of the 2022 General Election.”
- The Court must assume that election officials acted in good faith as a matter of law.
- All reasonable presumptions must favor the validity of an election.
When the judge is bought and paid for the results are predictable
Republican appointed judge. Read the opinion. He didn’t have the guts to overturn the election stating it’s never been done before. Dems did the same to blacks in the south when they wore sheets and hoods, remember?
Which Republican appointed him to the bench?
One of our Great Black Americans stated and I quote,”A Mans Rights rest in three Boxes, The Ballot Box, The Jury Boz and the Cartridge Box”. I feared we are fast approaching the final Box, The Cartridge Box.
I watched the trial….the evidence of fraud and tampering were there and so was “intent”. The “size to fit” argument by the state actually proves the intent. Two of the state’s witnesses clearly perjured themselves.
The problem was this civil servant judge making $120,000 didn’t have the spine to do what was right…..he figured his ruling would set off a brush fire across America that couldn’t be controlled. Someday we will find the right judge.
And this judge was a Trump appointed one. Geeze! We’re doomed!
The judge should be made an example of with extreme prejudice – and very publicly. Nothing else will steer this corruption off course. Other corrupt judges need to learn asap that corruption is bad for their health.
Judges are lawyers. Duh.