Posted BY: Jasmine | NwoReport
In a recent development, a comprehensive history of BPro/KNOWiNK election systems has raised significant concerns about their certification status, connectivity to the internet, reliance on cloud-based infrastructure, potential foreign influence, and alleged involvement in the illegal processing of election results. This revelation has sparked growing unease about the integrity of election processes utilizing KNOWiNK systems.
Overnight, a vigilant GP reader shared a contract involving KNOWiNK in Oregon. Notably, the contract contains a clause that mandates the system to permit County Elections Staff to override election results when deemed necessary. This provision raises further questions about the transparency and accountability of these election systems.
Trending: Corporate Dominance Grows: Ranchers’ Autonomy in Food Supply Wanes
The implications of these findings are particularly concerning, given the critical role of election technology in maintaining the integrity of democratic processes. The uncertainty surrounding the certification status of KNOWiNK systems and their potential vulnerability to foreign influence warrants a thorough investigation.
In conclusion, the recent revelations regarding KNOWiNK election systems underscore the need for heightened scrutiny and transparency in the electoral technology sector. The clause allowing election staff to override results adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious issue. As discussions surrounding the security and integrity of election processes continue, it is essential to ensure that the democratic principles upon which nations are built are upheld.
