Posted BY: | NwoReport
Two Pfizer executives faced questioning by the Australian Senate regarding their involvement in contentious vaccine mandates and their alleged disregard for the consequences of these measures. The inquiry revolved around accusations of harmful medical experiments, unethical vaccine mandates, and coercive policies negatively impacting people’s lives and livelihoods.
During the inquiry, Pfizer’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and the head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, dismissed claims of enforced vaccine mandates, asserting that all Australians had the freedom to choose whether to vaccinate. However, it was revealed that Pfizer had forced its staff to comply with vaccine mandates. The executives attempted to shift responsibility to Australian policymakers, suggesting that governments and health authorities determine vaccine mandates. The executives downplayed the alleged breaches of medical privacy resulting from the mandates, which reportedly led to widespread discrimination, defamation, coercion, and segregation of the unvaccinated. The impact was severe, with individuals reportedly denied organ transplants due to vaccine refusal. The mandates stirred civil unrest, sparking large-scale protests across Australia.
Deputy Opposition Whip Senator Matt O’Sullivan, chair of the senate inquiry, expressed dismay at Pfizer’s apparent lack of empathy and understanding for the hardships faced by those affected by the mandates. He challenged the executives’ assertions that individuals had not been forced, pointing to cases where people chose to adhere to the mandates and provide for their families.
The inquiry highlighted the tension between individual rights and public health measures, underscoring the profound societal impact of vaccine mandates. The contentious issue led to civil unrest and widespread protests, with individuals and medical freedom advocates asserting their right to bodily integrity and autonomy. As the debate over vaccine mandates continues, the movement for medical freedom gains momentum, driven by those who feel their rights and personal choices have been compromised.