Posted BY: | NwoReport
The entire investigative team tasked with probing tax fraud allegations against Hunter Biden has reportedly been removed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) at the request of the Department of Justice (DOJ), according to the New York Post.
The Criminal Supervisory Special Agent who has supervised the Hunter Biden probe since 2020 and served as a whistleblower on the investigation, was reportedly informed that he and his entire investigative team were being removed from the case, the agent’s attorney revealed, according to the New York Post. Alleging that the move was “clearly retaliatory,” the attorneys reportedly continued that the whistleblower was informed that the change came at the request of the DOJ despite testimony before a House Committee that promised no retaliatory measures would be taken, the outlet noted.
Trending: 2024: The End of Elections — or of Election Fraud?
Scoop: IRS whistleblower who alleged coverup in Hunter Biden tax investigation says his entire team was removed from case— Steven Nelson (@stevennelson10) May 15, 2023
His lawyers tell Congress that 'this move is clearly retaliatory and may also constitute obstruction of a congressional inquiry' https://t.co/bvAys2dUGS
“On April 27, 2023, IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel appeared before the House Committee on Ways and Means. He testified: ‘I can say without any hesitation there will be no retaliation for anyone making an allegation or a call to a whistleblower hotline.’ However, this move is clearly retaliatory and may also constitute obstruction of a congressional inquiry,” attorneys Mark Lytle and Tristan Leavitt reportedly wrote, according to the New York Post.
The whistleblower, an IRS supervisor, has alleged that there have been “clear conflicts of interest” in the DOJ’s handling of the ongoing investigation into allegations that Hunter Biden failed to pay taxes and made false statements on a federal firearms application. The whistleblower also alleged “preferential treatment and politics” are “improperly infecting decisions and protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances if the subject were not politically connected.”