Posted BY: RM | NwoReport
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has come under scrutiny due to reports indicating that it contains modified RNA (modRNA) instead of the widely known messenger RNA (mRNA). The New York-based vaccine manufacturer submitted documents to the FDA confirming this composition. The vaccine’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers, as issued by the regulatory authority, revealed that doses for children aged 5 to 11 contain 10 micrograms of modRNA, while those for individuals aged 12 and above contain 30 micrograms.
Pfizer’s official explanation states that modRNA directs cells to generate desired proteins, with certain nucleosides being replaced by modified ones to enhance immune evasion and protein production. However, concerns about synthetic modRNA’s impact on health have arisen. Injecting it into the body could lead to adverse events like strokes, cardiovascular issues, pulmonary embolism, and clot formation, observed in some recipients of the vaccine.
Trending: Mugshot of Donald Trump
Unlike natural mRNA, which is broken down and eliminated from the body within days, synthetic modRNA persists longer, producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein more efficiently. This is due to modRNA altering one of the four compounds in RNA. Despite this, the CDC maintains that Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain naturally occurring mRNA, not mentioning Moderna
.Research bioscientist David Wiseman and Ohio-based attorney Tom Renz have criticized the intentional use of modRNA while labeling it as mRNA, asserting that it constitutes misbranding and violates laws related to informed consent. Renz also warned that modRNA technology could extend beyond injections, reaching foods, aerosolized vaccines, and topical products.
In conclusion, concerns have been raised about Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine containing modRNA rather than the traditional mRNA. The controversy stems from potential health risks associated with synthetic modRNA and questions about the accuracy of labeling it as mRNA. Legal experts argue that this misrepresentation could breach informed consent regulations. As debates continue, discussions about transparency and accurate communication regarding vaccine composition and risks are vital.
