Posted BY: | NwoReport
In a recent discussion about media bias and its impact on public perception, Tucker Carlson highlighted an intriguing incident involving a significant figure connected to Barack Obama. Carlson emphasized that despite the gravity of the claims, the corporate media seemed to deliberately ignore the story, raising questions about their selective reporting.
During an appearance on Adam Carolla’s podcast, Carlson brought up the case of Larry Sinclair, an individual who asserted that he had engaged in drug use and sexual activities with Barack Obama prior to the latter’s 2008 campaign. Sinclair had offered to support his claims with an affidavit and even volunteered for a lie detector test. Carlson noted that Sinclair’s account appeared credible to him, stating, “I talked to Larry Sinclair about it. Definitely, it happened.” Despite Sinclair’s history of deception, Carlson believed that the specific details of the story made it compelling and likely true.
Trending: Majority of Democrats in AP Poll Believe Biden is Too Old for Re-Election
Carlson expressed his skepticism towards the media’s handling of the situation, suggesting that their silence was orchestrated by the Obama campaign’s threat to withhold access from any outlet that covered the claims. He pointed out that the revelation of Obama’s sexual orientation wouldn’t have had a monumental impact on the world, asserting that such tendencies were already somewhat known. In fact, Carlson referenced an earlier letter in which Obama himself acknowledged having experienced gay impulses.
In conclusion, Tucker Carlson’s discussion shed light on a curious case involving allegations about Barack Obama’s past, highlighting the media’s potential role in shaping narratives by selectively reporting or ignoring certain stories. This instance prompted questions about the balance between journalistic responsibility and political interests in shaping public discourse.
