Posted BY: Bill | NwoReport
The concern about President Biden’s cognitive abilities has raised questions about his fitness for office. Observers point to signs of confusion, forgetfulness, and improper use of political terms, suggesting possible dementia. Even respected sources like the Washington Post have raised doubts about his mental acuity. However, outward signs alone may not prove incompetence, as a definitive diagnosis requires a specific medical examination. It’s acknowledged that actions taken outside the public eye may differ from what’s seen publicly.
Historical examples, like Casey Stengel’s rambling press conferences and President Eisenhower’s confusion over sensitive military information, highlight the complexity of assessing public figures’ cognitive states. The crux of the matter is whether Biden’s behavior indicates a genuine threat.
Trending: Significant 74% Reduction in COVID-19 Excess Deaths Found in Study
In this article, I explore the challenge of distinguishing between age-related cognitive decline and typical political miscalculations. Drawing parallels, it highlights that even capable leaders have made mistakes. Notably, President Biden’s recent executive order aiming to enhance diversity and equity in the federal workforce is criticized for prioritizing identity traits over objective competence. This approach, if implemented, could transform federal employment criteria significantly, with potentially negative consequences akin to third-world nations.
The argument centers on whether this executive order, which seems unrealistic and legally questionable, reflects a misguided policy or evidence of cognitive decline. The narrative points out the implausibility of certain hiring criteria improving government efficiency and highlights potential legal challenges. While the discourse suggests that such policy initiatives may not come to fruition, it underscores the seriousness of potential issues emerging from a leader’s questionable decision-making. The piece also raises concerns about radical ideologues influencing the president, potentially affecting his decisions. The possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment is suggested to address these concerns about Biden’s fitness for office.
The criticism of the diversity-focused executive order serves as a focal point for discussing whether such decisions stem from cognitive impairment or flawed policy choices. The narrative concludes by suggesting the importance of addressing these concerns seriously, raising the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment.
