Posted BY: | NwoReport
The article discusses introducing laws aimed at banning disinformation and misinformation in various Western countries, except the United States, due to its strong protection of free speech under the First Amendment. In Europe, the UK, and Australia, governments have directly legislated against these issues, such as the EU Commission’s application of the ‘Digital Services Act’ (DSA) and Australia’s efforts to empower the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to combat harmful misinformation.
The article highlights a significant issue with these laws – they focus on the intent of the writers rather than the information itself. Terms like “disinformation” and “misinformation” are used to create the impression of addressing objective truth. Still, in reality, they target the creation of meanings that don’t align with the government’s stance. Determining a writer’s intent is challenging, and it’s further complicated because different readers can interpret the same text differently.
The author argues that anti-disinformation legislation patronizes and treats citizens as mere data-consuming machines, undermining individual thinking. They point out instances where governments themselves have made incorrect claims, casting doubt on their ability to judge what is “correct” information. Additionally, the author contends that these laws may not achieve their desired result because they focus on quantity rather than meaningful content. A well-researched and argued article can have a more significant impact than repetitive state propaganda.
In conclusion, the article criticizes the idea of attempting to control thought through legislation, suggesting that it is fundamentally flawed and destined to fail. It asserts that governments cannot truly stop people from thinking for themselves, and their attempts to regulate meaning are misguided. Ultimately, it characterizes such laws as “bad laws” built on disinformation.