Posted BY: RM | NwoReport
Around 5,000 duplicate ballots were shipped out to voters in Riverside County.
According to a statement from Riverside County Registrar of Voters Rebecca Spencer “a computer system error mistakenly generated duplicate mailing files for 5,000 voters.”
Spencer promised the duplicate votes won’t count.
Approximately 5,000 duplicate ballots were erroneously mailed to some voters in Riverside County. A computer system error mistakenly generated duplicate mailing files for 5,000 voters. The computer system error was identified over the weekend, however, the ballot packets were already delivered to the U.S. Postal Service.
“It is important to note that none of the duplicate ballots will result in a voter being able to cast more than one ballot,” said Registrar of Voters Rebecca Spencer. “I take election integrity seriously and apologize for the inconvenience.”
Each vote-by-mail envelope has a bar code. When the bar code is scanned as accepted at the Registrar of Voters office it automatically locks the voter’s record so that the voter can only vote once. If a voter who received two ballots returned both ballots, only one ballot would count. The first ballot received would be processed and the second ballot would be automatically voided.
Trending: 10 PayPal alternatives – for privacy or free speech
The Riverside County Registrar of Voters office recommends that any voters who receive two ballots should vote and return one of the ballots, then destroy the second ballot. It does not matter which ballot the voter returns as both ballots are the same. The affected voters live in the areas of Canyon Lake, Menifee, Murrieta, Wildomar and Winchester.
The computer system error is resolved and procedures have been put in place to prevent the error in the future.. Voters with questions or concerns regarding their ballot are asked to call the Riverside County Registrar of Voters at (951) 486-7200.
So, NWO Report, you censoring my comment because I expressed that your article fell short of the mark? You must realize I am right. There was nothing obscene or threatening at all. I’ll try again. If my comment doesn’t appear, I will be a lost reader for eternity going forward, I will also use my social media reach to steer anyone else I can clear of your website. Which I may do anyway if this incomplete article that fails to answer critical aspects is what I will keep getting.
Nothing has been censored that I know of. As far as the article if we missed something it will be corrected. Do we miss things or get something wrong sometimes? Yes, we do.
“The Riverside County Registrar of Voters office recommends that any voters who receive two ballots should vote and return one of the ballots, then destroy the second ballot.”
This presumes that both ballots make it all the way to the actual voter. Have people lost the ability to think logically and independently?
As a journalist, the author should have confirmed the following:
As a journalist, the author should have confirmed the following:
1. If a nefarious person (such as a democrat operative or postal worker–possibly bribed by some of the free money from the “inflation reduction act”) intercepts these duplicates and votes them early, the real voter will be disenfranchised if their ballot is second (i.e. the nefarious person’s vote prevails), correct? How will the system catch this, especially when ballot envelope signature verification is typically not being done correctly or at all?
2. What are the stats on the voter party affiliation for those voters mailed duplicate ballots (i.e is it a majority of one party or the other)? I’m guessing that the answer is a majority of these voters are republican and independent voters and a minority are democrat voters (i.e. results in a large number of votes getting shifted from R candidates, to D candidates)
Simple and logical questions that further illustrate the ability for fraud, or help confirm that this mistake will not result in cheating and voter disenfranchisement. This is what journalism should look like. Do better. This article and investigative journalism is incomplete and does not answer for the reader whether this will result in cheating or not. Grade: C-
“a computer system error”…my patootie! I think that’s the cover for plausible deniability. ANY person or group committing voter fraud needs to spend some serious time behind bars.