Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Proof Positive Obama Administration Stole Dividends from Fannie and Freddie Shareholders

July 25, 2017 Leave a comment

Documents DOJ Newly Released Under Court Order Reveal “Net Worth Sweep” Dividend Theft


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, after years of discouraging litigation, finally have the proof positive they need to demonstrate at court exactly how the Obama administration stole from them billions of dollars of profits earned by the Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs).

Department of Justice documents newly released under a court order issued by U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Margaret in case involving Fairholme Funds [Fairholme v. United States, No. 13-465 (Fed. Cl.)], a company owning shares of the mortgage giants, leave no doubt the Obama administration created a false pretext that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were yet in financial turmoil, and lied to Congress, shareholders, and the American public, to implement the “Net Worth Sweep,” on Aug. 17, 2012.

A contrived justification based on a specious argument

As has previously reported, an analysis of Treasury Department financial statements for 2012 and 2013 proves the “Net Worth Sweep” was a complex scheme the Obama administration concocted for Sec. Timothy Geithner’s Treasury to steal without Congressional authorization all GSE earnings, in order to divert the funds unconstitutionally to keep Obamacare from going bankrupt by using Fannie and Freddie’s earnings to pay the low-income insurance subsidies the House of Representatives refused to fund.

Government briefs filed in the Fairholme case before the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly argued the “Net Worth Sweep” was necessary to make sure the financially troubled GSEs did not burn through government bailout funds provided by the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (PSPA) of 2008, to pay dividends.

But a 17-page internal memo dated Dec. 12, 2011, written by to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner by Mary John Miller, the former Under Secretary for Domestic Finance for the Treasury, proves that as early as that date, fully 20 months before the “Net Worth Sweep” was implemented on Aug. 17, 2012, Treasury knew Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were returning to profitability.

Miller’s first suggestion, termed “Policy Option 1,” read as follows: “Restructure the calculation of Treasury’s dividend payments from a fixed 10 percent annual rate to a variable rate based on available positive net worth (i.e. establish an income sweep). This will ensure that the remaining PSPA funding capacity is not reduced in the future by draws to pay dividends.”

The newly released documents proved the Obama administration based the “Net Worth Sweep” of all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earnings on the specious argument that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac somehow would be compelled to pay dividends to shareholders from federal PSPA bailout funds if the GSEs lacked the financial strength to pay shareholder dividends from GSE earnings.

But the facts, as made abundantly clear from the newly released government documents, is that Treasury knew in 2012 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were going to become profit machines and that by confiscating all of the earnings from both GSEs, Treasury would reap a windfall far in excess of the 10 percent dividend specified in the original PSPA agreement.

The Truth: Treasury Knew Fannie and Freddie generated strong, persistent earnings

The newly released government documents make clear the Obama administration understood by mid-2012 that Fannie and Freddie could no longer be considered to be in financial distress, but were already generating strong earnings.

On June 25, 2012, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco met with Treasury Secretary Geithner and Treasury Under Secretary for Domestic Finance Mary Miller to discuss the financial status of Fannie and Freddie.

A memo prepared by Treasury staff on that day memorialized the discussion, noting that “[t]hrough weeks of negotiating terms of possible amendments to the PSPAs, [Mr. DeMarco] never questioned the need to adjust the dividend schedule this year. Since the Secretary raised the possibility of a [principal reduction] covenant, DeMarco no longer sees the urgency of amending the PSPAs this year.”

One of Mr. DeMarco’s stated reasons for being willing to delay the PSPA amendments was that “the GSEs will be generating large revenues over the coming years, thereby enabling them to pay the 10% annual dividend well into the future even with the caps.”

On July 20, 2012, Michael Stegman, a counselor to the Secretary of the Treasury (Geithner) for Housing Finance Policy, addressed a memo  addressed to Beth Mlynarczyk, then a senior advisor to the counselor on Housing Finance Policy at the Treasury, suggested that in light of the improved profitability of the GSEs, restructuring the 10 percent dividend on the PSPA would lead to “a better outcome” for Treasury.

A comment appended in the margin by an unnamed Treasury official to a “PSPA Amendment Q & A” draft document marked “Sensitive and Pre-Decisional” indicated that in the period July-August 2012, Treasury officials realized the “death spiral” expectation that Fannie and Freddie would “wind down” unable to pay the 10 percent PSPA dividend “no longer holds water, because there no longer was any expectation that the business of Fannie or Freddie would reduce in the immediate future.

The newly released government documents convey a clear sense the Obama Treasury Department knew, well in advance of implementing the “Net Worth Sweep,” that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had sufficient earnings to both pay Treasury the 10 percent dividend specified in the original PSPA and pay shareholders healthy dividends without risking the financial solvency of either of the GSEs.

But instead of paying shareholders, Geithner and the Obama administration Treasury Department decided to revise the PSPA so as to begin on Aug. 17, 2012 confiscating all earnings from both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while lying to Congress and the American public that the confiscation of earnings that rightfully should have gone to shareholders needed to be paid the Treasury?

Why? Because Treasury was happy to lie to Congress that the earnings of Fannie and Freddie were so fragile that Fannie and Freddie might have to tap into the PSPA to pay dividends – a eventuality the documents repeatedly prove Geithner and the Obama Treasury Department knew was never going to happen given by 2010 the return of both GSEs to healthy, sustainable, and consistent profits.

Obama’s plan to “wind down” Fannie and Freddie

Then, on Aug. 13, 2012, four days before the “Net Worth Sweep” was announced, Jim Parrott, then a senior advisor at the National Economic Council and the White House official perhaps working most closely with Treasury in crafting the “Net Worth Sweep” wrote a memo making it clear his intention was “making sure that each of these entities [Fannie and Freddie] pays the taxpayer back every dollar of profit they make, not just a 10 percent dividend.” [Underlining in original document.]

Parrott’s memo of Aug. 13, 2012, went on to note that under the “Net Worth Sweep,” Treasury “ultimately collect more money with the changes,” i.e. by abandoning the 10 percent dividend to make the Treasury “dividend” equal all Fannie and Freddie earnings. [Underlining in original document.]

Parrott concluded the memo of Aug. 13, 2012 by commenting, “With the overall set of changes we have removed any doubt about the long-term fate of these entities: they will NOT be allowed to return to profitable entities at the center of our housing finance system, but instead wound down and replaced with a system driven by private capital and lower risk to the taxpayer.” [Capital letters in original document.]

The Parrott email confirms previous reporting that the Obama administration had started planning as early as 2010 to eliminate home ownership as a central pillar of the American Dream.

That the Obama administration planned to “wind down” Fannie and Freddie helps explain why the Treasury Department was willing to strip them of the profits needed to rebuild the substantial capital base necessary for the two mortgage GSEs to continue playing their historical role of buying mortgages from mortgage originators as a plan to provide mortgage originators the liquidity need to keep the private middle-income mortgage market in the United States.

As noted in an article published March 7, previously unpublished Treasury documents make clear Secretary Geithner was spearheading an Obama administration plan to close Fannie and Freddie, knowing that doing so would mean the end of the 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage that has been essential getting first-time homebuyers into the market for generations.

The goal of the Obama administration was to turn the mortgage finance market over to Wall Street and the “Too Big to Fail” (TBTF) big banks, including Wells Fargo and Bank of America – a plan currently championed by Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tennessee, and by the Mortgage Banking Association, in a move that would transform the United States from a nation of homeowners to a European-style nation of renters.

On Aug. 16, 2012, the day before the “Net Worth Sweep” was announced, a memo authored by Timothy Bowler, then Deputy Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability at Treasury, and addressed to a large number of people at Treasury and the White House working to implement the “Net Worth Sweep,” left no doubt that the impact of the policy inevitably would mean the demise of Fannie and Freddie.

“By taking all of their profits going forward, we are making clear that the GSEs will not ever be allowed to return to profitable entities at the center of our housing finance system,” Bowler wrote. [Underlining in original document.]

The new Treasury documents released make clear the Obama administration was surprisingly devoid of any conscience that it was both morally wrong and a major violation of corporate law that the “Net Worth Sweep” was designed to confiscate 100 percent of all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s earnings, to the point where both GSEs were closed, without ever paying the current shareholders as much as a penny of the dividends they were owed.

These documents read as a whole document how methodically the Obama administration calculated to confiscate what has amounted to $270 billion in Fannie and Freddie earnings in what amounts to the biggest theft of shareholder dividends to have ever occurred in U.S. corporate history.

Trump administration continues “Net Wort Sweep,” still robbing GSE shareholders

At the end of June, the Federal Housing Finance Administration (FHFA) continued the “Net Worth Sweep,” paying Treasury as “dividends accrued” an additional $7 billion in earnings, despite FHFA’s testimony under oath to the Senate Banking Committee on May 11 that under terms of the Housing and Economic Reform Act of 2008 (HERA), he has the responsibility to make sure Fannie and Freddie retain adequate operating capital, giving him the ability to end the “Net Worth Sweep” on his own authority.

If the “Net Worth Sweep” continues, Watt testified by the end of the year Fannie and Freddie’s capital buffer will be zero, with the result neither GSE “will have the ability to weather any loss it experiences in any quarter without drawing further on taxpayer support.”

Fannie and Freddie have paid back over $270 on the $188 billion the Treasury invested in the GSEs with the 2008 PSPA, repaying nearly in full the principal and the 10 percent dividend the Obama administration had negotiated under the 2008 Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (PSPAs).

Leaked Obama Plan To Fight Election-Day Meddling Included ‘Martial Law’

July 23, 2017 Leave a comment

Former US President Barack Obama has been criticized by both Republicans and fellow Democrats for withholding information about Russia’s alleged interference in the US presidential election – criticism that has only intensified since President Donald Trump triumphed over Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election.

Now, in yet another troubling sign that the Obama administration believed outside hacking groups posed a significant threat to the election, Time magazine reports that his administration had devised a detailed plan to fend off any cyberattacks that sought to falsify vote totals during the election. Obama has been criticized for not informing the American people about hacking attempts allegedly carried out by Russia-linked groups for fear of “rocking the boat” and damaging Clinton’s chances of victory.

Obama and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice

The 15-page plan, a copy of which was obtained by Time, stipulates that “in almost all potential cases of malicious cyber activity impacting election infrastructure, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments,” the governments would have primary jurisdiction to respond.

And if an attack were launched, the White House had several “enhanced procedures” it had prepared to fight back against the attackers.

The document “establishes the federal response plan for a cyber incident that is (or a group of related cyber incidents that together are) likely to result in demonstrable impact to election infrastructure during the 2016 United States presidential election. Furthermore, Obama’s plan appears to include contingencies for martial law…

“Though the plan emphasized the vital role that local authorities would play in combating the hackers, clarifying that they would have primary jurisdiction during an attack, it noted that for the deployment of “armed federal law enforcement agents” who would be deployed to polling places if hackers managed to halt voting.

It also foresaw the deployment of “Active and Reserve” military forces and members of the National Guard “upon a request from a federal agency and the direction of the Secretary of Defense or the President.”

The plan also authorized the creation of the federal “Cyber Response Group,’ which has the authority to form a Cyber Unified Coordination Group to coordinate these activities

The Department of Homeland Security established a committee to coordinate a response to any attempted election hacking. The group includes seven additional agencies on top of the FBI. They are:

  • DHS, National Protection and Programs Directorate.
  • National Association of Secretaries of State
  • State nad Local Election Officials
  • US Election Assistance Commission
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Department of Justice
  • The FBI
  • Department of Defense Federal Voting Assistance Program

Even though Obama had no intention of sharing this information with the public, the report ironically included a subsection outlining the administration’s policy for disclosing information about cyberattacks to the public. In anticipation of an attack, the group would develop integrated public relations guidance that seeks to maintain election infrastructure. The public relations guidance developed by those agencies will be fully coordinated before Nov. 1 2016, with the NSC to ensure that appropriate spokesperson re identified, remarks are fully consistent and joint messages are used in any potential cyber incident.”

On election day, the group set up a national monitoring center at FBI headquarters. The command center, which operated between 6 am and midnight, served as the launchpad for any counterattacks.

By Election Day, with widespread coverage of Russian hacking and then-candidate Donald Trump’s assertions that the vote would be rigged against him, Gallup found that only 30% of Americans had faith in the honesty of elections, while 69% did not.

Since news first broke that Russian-backed hackers had tried to infiltrate voting systems in 21 states, several notable Democrats – House intelligence Committee ranking member Adam Schiff among them – have criticized Obama’s unwillingness to disclose the information to the public.

First it was Susan Rice illegally ‘unmasking” Trump associates to try and create some illusory heft behind the allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to tilt the election in Trump’s favor. Then the public was informed about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s meeting with former President Bill Clinton and an investigation was launched. Today, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein suggested that former FBI Director James Comey’s decision to leak his memo about a meeting between himself and President Trump – the one in which the president appeared to lean on his top cop to drop the bureau’s investigation into former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn – was improper.

This, combined with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s announcement that he’s examining Trump’s finances as the next step in his investigation into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, begs the question: When will Congress and the FBI switch gears and investigate the DNC?

Read the report in full below:

354227068 Russia Hacking President Obama s Previously Undisclosed Election Day Plan by zerohedge on Scribd

This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at

Leaked Recording Shows Israeli Leader Netanyahu’s True Feelings On Obama

July 22, 2017 Leave a comment

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed the European Union (EU) and former U.S. President Barack Obama because of their unwillingness to support his home country. Netanyahu made these strong remarks during a private meeting with the leaders of Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic.

His comments were known thanks to The Haaretz newspaper, which released a recorded audio where the Israeli PM is heard saying there was a concerning problem during Obama’s tenure in the White House. Netanyahu brutally criticized the Democrat for his administration’s weak foreign policy toward the Middle East

In addition, the Israeli leader said that the nation had a “big problem” in the U.S., given the fact that while he supported bombing Syria in order to fight ISIS, he assured he was not okay on how Obama managed Iran. However, according to the audio, he assured things are different now under Trump administration.

, Netanyahu´s comments about how Trump administration has a stronger strange on its foreign policy toward the Middle East is based on clear signs.

Regarding the EU, Netanyahu said to his fellow leaders that this entity is the only association of countries in the entire world that conditions the relations with his nation, that produces technology and every single area, on political conditions. Additionally, he emphasized that it is a crazy situation considering that no one else does it.

Netanyahu added that he wanted the meeting to motivate the leaders’ ability to communicate with other members of the EU in order to find a solution, since he assures this would “help Europe, twice” Also, Netanyahu called to never undermine that one Western nation that defends the values and interests of Europe.

In a powerful moment of his speech, the Israeli PM explained the lack of logic of the EU, since he assured that this entity is undermining its progress and security by undermining Israel and its connection with this country’s innovation by an irrational attempt to create conditions.

After these remarks, the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban cut in and claimed that the EU is even more unique, since it places conditions on the ones already inside entity, and not only the nations on the outside. This comment was a joke referencing the EU putting sanctions on Hungary because of its opposition to George Soros’ funded immigration efforts.

After Orban’s joke, Netanyahu said that Europe needs to decide if it wants to live and thrive or if it wants to shrivel and eventually disappear. Additionally, Israel’s leader joked about not being politically correct, and assured the remarks he made about Europe’s security and economic future were undeniable facts, and that both of these concerns mandate a different policy toward his country.

Netanyahu also said Israel is part of the European culture, and that this continent ends in Israel. He praised Christians for their support of the country´s statehood and mentioned Israel’s own wall and the nation’s effort in blocking the different terrorist organizations in the region from getting weapons.

Regarding this delicate issue, Netanyahu told they blocked the border not only in Egypt but also in the Golan Heights. He explained they built the wall since there was a problem with Iran and ISIS trying to build a terror front there. In fact, the Israeli PM even threatened Vladimir Putin and assured he told him that every time Israel see them transferring weapons to Hezbollah, they would not hesitate in hurt them.

Naturally, Netanyahu’s comments about how Trump administration has a stronger strange on its foreign policy toward the Middle East is based on clear signs. One of the most important actions was to support Saudi Arabia’s crown prince Mohammad Bin Salman, given the fact that he could represent a historical change in his country´s relationship with Israel

Although it was recently known that Trump administration re-certified the controversial Iran nuclear deal, it has also increased sanctions against the Muslim country, to the point where many experts believe it could cause the Islamic republic to withdraw from it.

In addition, another clear sign of the U.S. stronger position towards this country was the selection of hardline Michael D’Andrea as the new chief of Iran operation, signaling that the CIA could take a harder stance against the Iranian regime.

D’Andrea, known internally by his nickname “Dark Prince,” previously worked on Osama Bin Laden’s hunt and led the agency’s controversial drone killing and enemy detainee programs. His selection clearly mirrors the views of Defense Secretary James Mattis, who once listed off his three main priorities as “Iran, Iran, Iran.”

Obama Hacked Indiana Elections While Mike Pence Was Governor

July 22, 2017 Leave a comment

Barack Obama ordered the Department of Homeland Security to hack Indiana’s state electoral system almost 15,000 times when Mike Pence was Governor. 

According to a new investigation, DHS officials attacked Indiana’s elections with 14,800 ‘scans’ between Nov.1, 2016, to Dec. 16, 2016.

The attacks are the second confirmed assault by the Obama administration against states that rejected Obama’s attempt to increase federal involvement in state and local election systems. reports: Members of the National Association of Secretaries of State voted Saturday at their winter meeting to oppose the designation. They are asking President Donald Trump to overturn it.

Former Indiana Gov. Mike Pence was also Trump’s vice presidential-elect during much of the period covered by the DHS scans of the Indiana system.

Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson, the incoming president of the association, told TheDCNF Tuesday that, “we know that between November 1 and December 16 we were scanned with about 14,800 scans, nearly 15,000 different times.”

The state’s IT team traced the intruder to a DHS computer’s IP address. The same DHS unit attempted 10 times in 2016 to hack into the Georgia electoral system.

Federal officials are barred under DHS rules from trying to penetrate a state system without the express approval of the state. Neither Georgia nor Indiana approved the DHS scanning attempts.

The DHS inspector general has launched an official investigation into the Georgia breach attempt.

Thomas Vessely, IT director for the Indiana secretary of state, told TheDCNF that “we kindly declined [DHS] assistance because we were very comfortable in the work we were doing in monitoring our election system.”

Lawson said she “always assumed it was because I was the incoming President of the National Association of Secretaries of State and because we declined their assistance.”

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp told The DCNF Jan. 24, 2016, he was suspicious because four of the 10 attacks against the Georgia election network occurred as he was about to talk to DHS officials, or coincided with his public testimony opposing the critical infrastructure designation.

“It’s certainly concerning about the dates,” Kemp said.

Kemp hopes the IG can determine if the hacks were timed to intimidate him.

Lawson said despite the scale of the scans, the DHS efforts to attack its election system was unsuccessful. “Our voter registration system was not penetrated.”

She said there was “one slight penetration on an (election) website that was actually old and out of date, so it didn’t go anywhere.”

Governmental deployment of IT technology could be an evolving new tool against political opponents or to impose censorship, according to James Scott, a senior fellow at the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology, a cybersecurity think tank.

“Censorship has always been an issue in the brick-and-mortar world. So, censorship in the digital landscape is simply just transference of methods,” Scott said. “I think within federal agencies it is possible to imagine that there are some overreaching, aggressive managers.”

Indiana officials have not yet asked the DHS IG to look at their state’s situation. “We’re taking the matter under consideration,” Lawson said, adding that “we have sent letters to our congressional folks, our governor, and others to make them aware this happened. I’m very concerned, very concerned.”

A DHS spokesman told TheDCNF that, “we take the trust of our partners in the public and private sectors seriously and will work with them to address any concerns. DHS does not conduct scans of networks or systems without the cooperation and consent of the system owner.”

Marc Lotter, a spokesman for Pence, told TheDCNF his boss personally knew Lawson while in Indiana and had complete confidence in her handling the attacks.

“The VP has tremendous faith in the Secretary of State and knows it’s in good hands,” said Marc. He’s sure she will handle it properly,” he said.

Obama Officials Going To Jail For Unmasking Citizens

July 21, 2017 2 comments

A number of Obama administration officials illegally unmasked American citizens, according to a source close to the House Intelligence Committee’s review.

According to the source, over a half-dozen senior Obama aides are now of interest to House committee investigators who are looking into whether possible felonies have been committed. reports: Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., issued subpoenas in May to the CIA, FBI and NSA for records about the identification of American citizens in intelligence reports, also known as “unmasking.”

The subpoenas covered 2016 and were issued after allegations Rice and others unmasked associates of now-President Trump. Fox News is told the agencies have now “fully complied.”

While Nunes has taken himself out of the committee’s Russia inquiry following an ethics complaint which he has denied, the chairman remains involved in the unmasking inquiry. Committee Democrats have criticized Nunes for issuing subpoenas in his current capacity.

Separately, the committee has been preparing to hear from Rice in a closed-door session as early as Tuesday, though the former national security adviser is no longer expected to testify that day.

The “unmasking” issue is likely to be a central focus of her eventual testimony.

The source said some of the unmasking in question could be routine – though other requests appeared “unwarranted” and will require “more explanation.” The source said House investigators are only at the beginning of their assessment and described the paper trail as containing “a significant number of records.”

The congressional scrutiny at this stage does not mean investigators have concluded any official violated the law or internal regulations.

Rice spokeswoman Erin Pelton previously told the Associated Press that Rice is cooperating with House and Senate intelligence committees.

Rice in March had told PBS she “knew nothing” about Trump associate unmasking.

But in early April, she acknowledged she asked for the identities of U.S. citizens in intelligence reports, while defending those requests as routine and denying leaking any Trump-related information.

“I leaked nothing to nobody, and never have,” she told MSNBC.

2 Men Indicted, Charged As Third Man Walks Free With Obama’s Help

July 20, 2017 Leave a comment

The list of Obama offenses just gets longer and longer. Yesterday, the Department of Justice issued indictments on suspects charged with stealing and selling government weapons software to Iran. The men, Mohammed Saeed Ajily and Mohammed Reza Rezakhah are named in relation to a hacking operation against Arrow Tech, a Vermont-based firm that designs military munitions and analyses.

Although enemies hacking into government contractor’s computer systems and databases isn’t new, this story has a real twist.

The truly outrageous part is Obama’s calculated release of the third man involved in the treason. Nima Golestaneh was arrested in Turkey in 2013 and later extradited to the U.S. for hacking the Arrow Tech system. In fact, he plead guilty to the cybercrime and wire fraud charges in 2015, and was sentenced to prison.

However, apparently, Iran wanted their hacker back, because Obama promised to “exchange” seven Iranian prisoners for four Americans being held in the Muslim country. The Americans included a journalist and a pastor who rejoiced once back in America.

Of the seven Iranians Obama turned loose, six of the them had dual citizenship, but Golestaneh did not. At that time, Obama wielded strong control over the public media, and although questions were raised, the uneven–almost submissive–release was soon forgotten.

The crimes committed by the men the former president pardoned involved shipping equipment and information to Iran. Nader Modanlo worked for NASA, the Department of Defense, and a number of private companies that contracted with the government. He was found guilty of sending secrets to Iran that helped them launch their first satellite into space.

Bahram Mechanic illegally sent millions of dollars’ worth of private U.S. energy technology to Iran. The technology included a wide range of military systems, including surface-air and cruise missiles. During the watchful eyes of Obama, from July 2010 and 2015, Mechanic obtained 28 million different components worth $24 million and sent them to his mother country.

Mechanic’s partner Khosrow Afghahi, who co-owned Faratel Corporation in Iran and the Houston-based Smart Power System, was also one of the convicted criminals. The vice president of Smart Power assisted in the treason and regularly received lists of microelectronics in the U.S.

The seven men were supposed to fly back to Tehran, but actually, they vanished after their release. Two of the men involved in the embargo violation went home to their families in Texas and resumed their plush life styles. The remaining five disappeared across the country.

Nima Golstaneh spent his time hacking. Instead of gaining a business and public influence like the others, he simply continued to steal from Arrow Tech. Apparently, he wasn’t the only Iranian looking for free secrets from the defense contractor.

The three men stole the “Projectile Rocket Ordnance Design and Analysis System,” or PRODAS, which helps users analyze and create munitions such as bullets and GPS-guided artillery shells. The software is classified as a “defense article” and costs nearly $800,000.

The nefarious actions of the former president seem deliberately calculated to support terrorist nations and basically release all government defense secrets to America’s enemies.

The two men were discovered when they began advertising their hacking abilities against “Western” cyber security and sanctions created for U.S. protections. However, the entire scheme dates back to 2007, just about the time Obama took office, so the whole mess is his fault.

Obama should have never released Golstaneh or the others. His entire eight-year agenda was designed to promote a Muslim takeover of America. It’s also obvious from the amount of information and weapons sold to Iran that Arrow Tech, NASA, the Department of Defense, and every other existing government agency needs higher vetting rules.

The lost secrets and other treason that went on during Obama’s presidency may never be fully uncovered. Fortunately, there’s absolutely no way that President Trump would ever release such criminals. American finally has an ally, not a conspirator, in the White House.


Judge: Obama Admin Hacked Supreme Court Justice John Roberts

July 15, 2017 Leave a comment

A Federal Judge has revealed that the Obama administration hacked Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts as part of a surveillance program on Donald Trump.

Tapes released by Judge G. Murray Snow, show that Justice Roberts was under surveillance by the Deep State under Obama’s orders, overseen by CIA director John Brennan and director of national intelligence James Clapper. reports: The existence of this surveillance program has been corroborated by Wikileaks’ “Vault 7” release and by the public comments of former CIA and NSA contractor Dennis Montgomery, who says he worked on the program for Brennan and Clapper.

Montgomery has gone public with his claims exposing how the program was used to spy on President Donald Trump when he was a private citizen. Montgomery has gained immunity and desperately wants House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes or other lawmakers to call him to testify about what he knows.

On the explosive tapes, Blixseth walks Arpaio and Zullo through the details of the program on a computer screen. At one point, the three begin pulling up specific names of targeted individuals.

“You know who that guy is? That’s the head of the FISA court they hacked into, Reggie Walton,” Blixseth tells the investigators.

“John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, was hacked,” Blixseth tells Arpaio and Zullo.

LISTEN TO THE TAPE HERE (18:00 Minute Mark)

Insiders have always been skeptical of Roberts’ motives for siding with President Obama on the 2012 Obamacare case. While there’s still no available evidence that Roberts was blackmailed, the allegation that he was “hacked” by Obama officials provides some more context into the justice’s controversial career.

As Big League Politics reported, former FBI director James Comey seized and buried volumes of information that demonstrated this wide-ranging government surveillance operation targeting Donald Trump before he became president.

Larry Klayman, attorney for former NSA and CIA contractor and whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, delivered to the FBI 47 hard drives and data amounting to more than 600 million pages of documentation on the surveillance scheme. Then-FBI director James Comey’s general counsel James Baker took the data into his possession, according to multiple sources. But despite possessing Montgomery’s bombshell whistleblower revelations, Comey never acted on or publicized the information.

Additionally, Comey’s former firm Lockheed Martin granted entry to Montgomery to one of its facilities to help him work on the alleged mass surveillance program, which was allegedly overseen by Obama administration officials John Brennan and James Clapper and specifically targeted Trump.

“This guy showed me 900 million phone calls. And I see myself in there. I see people I know. I see Donald Trump in there a zillion times, and Bloomberg is in there,” Blixseth said on the tape, referring to information that Montgomery allegedly showed him.

“We don’t have any comment,” the FBI told Big League Politics when questioned about the existence of the program.

“I provided to the FBI seventeen businesses of Donald Trump, including the Trump Tower, the Trump leasing programs, all of these different programs, and including Trump himself and the various family members that had been wiretapped under these programs,” Montgomery said in a recent interview. “There has been a wiretap on Trump for years.”

“I started by going to Maricopa County and showing that Sheriff Arpaio himself was wiretapped under the Obama administration,” the whistleblower said.

“I was a CIA contractor both under John Brennan and under James Clapper and these individuals were running domestic surveillance programs in the United States collecting information on Americans. This isn’t political. They were collecting information on Republicans and Democrats. But they collected everything they could find. Bank accounts, phone numbers, chats, emails, and they collected a massive amount of it under the Obama administration,” Montgomery said.

%d bloggers like this: